Skip to content

Conversation

@cppcoffee
Copy link
Member

@cppcoffee cppcoffee commented May 27, 2025

Perhaps using transactionID as a type instead of [TransactionIDSize]byte would be easier to read.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 65.25%. Comparing base (d07109b) to head (733e2a6).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #227   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   65.25%   65.25%           
=======================================
  Files          27       27           
  Lines        2639     2639           
=======================================
  Hits         1722     1722           
  Misses        907      907           
  Partials       10       10           
Flag Coverage Δ
go 65.25% <100.00%> (ø)
wasm 41.98% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@cppcoffee cppcoffee closed this May 27, 2025
@cppcoffee cppcoffee deleted the id branch June 2, 2025 08:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant