common: ChangeLog supplement for #6117 and #6127

[grom72]

• Requires common: pmem2_badblock_next is replaced by pmem2_badblock_next_internal #6133

This change is 

[janekmi]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 4 unresolved discussions (waiting on @grom72 and @osalyk)

---

ChangeLog line 1 at r1 (raw file):

DoW Mmm DD YYYY Somebody <[email protected]>  

---

ChangeLog line 1 at r1 (raw file):

DoW Mmm DD YYYY Somebody <[email protected]>  

I am not so sure having so elaborate placeholder is better. I guess before the release, the best matching line of this kind is just copied over and adjusted. Having to replace a few words instead of just one may be more error prone and IMHO simplifies nothing. Thoughts? @osalyk?

---

ChangeLog line 7 at r1 (raw file):

	- remove non-Linux support from all compilation paths (OS_KERNEL_NAME)
	- add an aarch64 cross-compilation (requested by DAOS)
	- mute annoying error messages when transactions are intentional abort (#6117)

Or intentional aborts? What does it mean "things are abort"? If you can argue for this case please do because I am sincerely curious.

Suggestion:

mute annoying error messages when transactions are intentionally aborted

---

ChangeLog line 8 at r1 (raw file):

	- add an aarch64 cross-compilation (requested by DAOS)
	- mute annoying error messages when transactions are intentional abort (#6117)
  	- mute error message "Cannot find any matching device, no bad blocks found" when PMDK is used without PMem (#6127)

There are some spaces before tab. Please remove.

---

ChangeLog line 8 at r1 (raw file):

	- add an aarch64 cross-compilation (requested by DAOS)
	- mute annoying error messages when transactions are intentional abort (#6117)
  	- mute error message "Cannot find any matching device, no bad blocks found" when PMDK is used without PMem (#6127)

It is good to know this one was not so annoying as the previous one. 😆

Code quote:

error message

[grom72]

Reviewable status: 0 of 1 files reviewed, 3 unresolved discussions (waiting on @janekmi and @osalyk)

---

ChangeLog line 1 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, janekmi (Jan Michalski) wrote…

I am not so sure having so elaborate placeholder is better. I guess before the release, the best matching line of this kind is just copied over and adjusted. Having to replace a few words instead of just one may be more error prone and IMHO simplifies nothing. Thoughts? @osalyk?

Done

---

ChangeLog line 7 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, janekmi (Jan Michalski) wrote…

Or intentional aborts? What does it mean "things are abort"? If you can argue for this case please do because I am sincerely curious.

Done.

---

ChangeLog line 8 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, janekmi (Jan Michalski) wrote…

There are some spaces before tab. Please remove.

Done.

---

ChangeLog line 8 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, janekmi (Jan Michalski) wrote…

It is good to know this one was not so annoying as the previous one. 😆

Done.

---

ChangeLog line 1 at r1 (raw file):

DoW Mmm DD YYYY Somebody <[email protected]>  

Done.

[grom72]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1.
Reviewable status: 0 of 1 files reviewed, 3 unresolved discussions (waiting on @janekmi and @osalyk)

[janekmi]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @osalyk)

[grom72]

Reviewed all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @osalyk)

[osalyk]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @grom72)

[janekmi]

Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @grom72)