Skip to content

Update the comparison to ProbNumDiffEq.jl#811

Merged
pnkraemer merged 1 commit into
pnkraemer:mainfrom
nathanaelbosch:update-probnumdiffeqjl-comparison
Apr 3, 2025
Merged

Update the comparison to ProbNumDiffEq.jl#811
pnkraemer merged 1 commit into
pnkraemer:mainfrom
nathanaelbosch:update-probnumdiffeqjl-comparison

Conversation

@nathanaelbosch
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@nathanaelbosch nathanaelbosch commented Mar 17, 2025

ProbNumDiffEq.jl implements state-space factorizations which make the EK0 and a diagonal version of the EK1 scale linearly with the dimension of the ODE. This PR therefore adjusts the comparison section of the probdifeq documentation to remove this aspect from the comparison, as nowadays ProbNumDiffEq.jl should behave quite similarly to probdiffeq and scale well with the problem size.

@pnkraemer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Awesome, thanks for these updates! 😊

Let me know when this PR is ready to be reviewed. 👍

@pnkraemer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Hi :) The PR says it's still a draft, but the changes look pretty complete to me.

Should we mark it as ready for review and start looking into merging it?

@nathanaelbosch nathanaelbosch marked this pull request as ready for review April 3, 2025 07:23
@nathanaelbosch
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

nathanaelbosch commented Apr 3, 2025

Hi, sorry for the delayed response! I now marked the PR as ready for review, so please let me know if it needs additional changes or feel free to adjust it directly.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@pnkraemer pnkraemer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cheers man! I appreciate the updates :)

@pnkraemer pnkraemer merged commit f81613d into pnkraemer:main Apr 3, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants