Add lstocchi as Podman Reviewer

[l0rd]

Luca remarkable knowledge of the Windows virtualization platform would be beneficial for reviewing PRs and triaging issues.

His contributions to the Podman repository during the last six months:

• auto-add user to Hyper-V Administrators group #28535
• Propose running init/rm command on hyperv machine in elevated mode when required #27932
• fix hyperv ignition cleanup and error handling #27931
• Prevent starting and stopping legacy hyperv machines when not elevated #27885
• Prevent non hyper-v admin users to execute machine commands #27650
• HyperV machine should reuse hvsock registry entries when possible #26277
• fix wsl install workflow on machine init command #26201
• fix: check npipe when executing podman compose on wsl vm #20478

@lstocchi as per the https://github.com/containers/podman/blob/main/GOVERNANCE.md you need to add a comment to this PR indicating your willingness to assume the responsibilities of a Reviewer.

Checklist

Ensure you have completed the following checklist for your pull request to be reviewed:

• Certify you wrote the patch or otherwise have the right to pass it on as an open-source patch by signing all
  commits. (git commit -s). (If needed, use git commit -s --amend). The author email must match
  the sign-off email address. See CONTRIBUTING.md
  for more information.
• Referenced issues using Fixes: #00000 in commit message (if applicable)
• Tests have been added/updated (or no tests are needed)
• Documentation has been updated (or no documentation changes are needed)
• All commits pass make validatepr (format/lint checks)
• Release note entered in the section below (or None if no user-facing changes)

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

[packit-as-a-service]

tmt tests failed for commit 9762b6b. @lsm5, @psss, @thrix please check.

[lsm5]

LGTM

[lstocchi]

Thank you! It would be an honor to become a reviewer for this project. I am happy to accept the role and help you on the Windows side!!

[mheon]

LGTM

Per governance, two maintainers concurring is enough to approve. I'm going to merge.

[Luap99]

Process wise it would be nice if we could at least cc all maintainers on such PRs. Not that I have any objections but it is nice to know (officially) when we onboard new members.

cc @containers/podman-maintainers

---

Welcome @lstocchi, our main developer chat is on #podman-dev:matrix.org so I recommend you join that to know what is going in general.