Skip to content

Update dependencies #3359

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Update dependencies #3359

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

rolnico
Copy link
Member

@rolnico rolnico commented Mar 13, 2025

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • A PR or issue has been opened in all impacted repositories (if any)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?
No

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Dependencies update

What is the current behavior?
Old dependencies

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

ArtefactId Old Version New Version
assertj-core 3.26.0 3.27.3
commons-cli 1.8.0 1.9.0
commons-compress 1.26.2 1.27.1
commons-configuration2 2.10.1 2.11.0
commons-csv 1.11.0 1.13.0
commons-io 2.16.1 2.18.0
commons-lang3 3.14.0 3.17.0
commons-text 1.12.0 1.13.0
groovy 4.0.21 4.0.26
guava 33.2.1-jre 33.4.0-jre
jackson-core 2.17.1 2.18.3
jackson-databind 2.17.1 2.18.3
jackson-annotations 2.17.1 2.18.3
junit-jupiter 5.10.2 5.12.0
logback-classic 1.5.14 1.5.17
maven-core 3.8.5 3.9.9
maven-plugin-annotations 3.13.0 3.15.1
mockito-core 5.12.0 5.16.0
poi 5.2.5 5.4.0
slf4j-api 2.0.13 2.0.17
snakeyaml 2.2 2.4
testcontainers 1.19.8 1.20.6
xz 1.9 1.10
zstd-jni 1.5.6-3 1.5.7-1

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please check if the following requirements are fulfilled

  • The Breaking Change or Deprecated label has been added
  • The migration steps are described in the following section

What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR? (migration steps)

Other information:
Performance comparison on my computer:

Module Before (s) After (s) Diff (s) Evolution (%)
powsybl 0.857 0.669 -0.188 -21.94%
Commons test 1.211 1.232 +0.021 +1.73%
Commons 7.159 6.796 -0.363 -5.07%
Computation API 2.072 1.779 -0.293 -14.14%
Tools 1.668 1.585 -0.083 -4.98%
Tools test 1.296 1.313 +0.017 +1.31%
Local computation 4.655 4.570 -0.085 -1.83%
Math 2.102 2.126 +0.024 +1.14%
IIDM 0.018 0.021 +0.003 +16.67%
IIDM network model 4.638 5.358 +0.720 +15.53%
IIDM common extensions 0.911 1.200 +0.289 +31.74%
Config Test 0.562 0.625 +0.063 +11.21%
IIDM testing networks 0.403 0.466 +0.063 +15.64%
IIDM TCK 2.149 2.367 +0.218 +10.15%
IIDM network model implementation 5.996 6.900 +0.904 +15.08%
IIDM serializer/deserializer 15.674 16.736 +1.062 +6.77%
Load-flow 0.022 0.019 -0.003 -13.64%
Load-flow API 2.171 2.035 -0.136 -6.27%
Network modifications 5.291 5.064 -0.227 -4.29%
Action 1.463 1.675 +0.212 +14.49%
IIDM network criteria 2.475 2.596 +0.121 +4.89%
Contingency 0.017 0.015 -0.002 -11.76%
Contingency API 2.619 2.482 -0.137 -5.23%
Contingency DSL 3.626 3.714 +0.088 +2.43%
Scripting 4.587 4.616 +0.029 +0.63%
IIDM scripting 4.909 5.204 +0.295 +6.01%
CGMES conversion 56.409 56.265 -0.144 -0.26%
Time series API 3.748 4.051 +0.303 +8.09%
Dynamic Simulation API 1.716 1.687 -0.029 -1.69%
Dynamic Security analysis 2.368 2.279 -0.089 -3.76%
IEEE CDF model 0.968 1.078 +0.110 +11.37%
MATPOWER converter 2.633 2.596 -0.037 -1.41%
PSSE converter 4.308 4.443 +0.135 +3.13%
PowerFactory model 0.915 0.881 -0.034 -3.72%
PowerFactory converter 2.580 2.604 +0.024 +0.93%
Security Analysis Default Implementation 2.359 2.035 -0.324 -13.73%
Sensitivity analysis API 2.343 2.341 -0.002 -0.09%
Short-circuit API 2.731 2.521 -0.210 -7.69%
Time series DSL 6.867 6.966 +0.099 +1.44%
Total 247.00 249.00 +2.00 +0.81%

rolnico added 2 commits March 13, 2025 17:17
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Rol <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Rol <[email protected]>
@rolnico rolnico self-assigned this Mar 13, 2025
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Rol <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants