Skip to content

PSS/E import - support boundary trafo between area #3401

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pjanecek0
Copy link
Contributor

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • A PR or issue has been opened in all impacted repositories (if any)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?

#3390

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

What is the current behavior?

#3390

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please check if the following requirements are fulfilled

  • The Breaking Change or Deprecated label has been added
  • The migration steps are described in the following section

What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR? (migration steps)

Other information:

@pjanecek0 pjanecek0 changed the title Psse area trf boundary PSS/E import - support boundary trafo between area Apr 9, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@marqueslanauja marqueslanauja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree with the changes.

Maybe combine the two unit tests into a single test case. We try to reduce the number of files and minimize the overall size used in testing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants