Skip to content

Migration powsybl dependencies 2025.0.0 #517

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 16 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

EstherDarkish
Copy link
Contributor

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • A PR or issue has been opened in all impacted repositories (if any)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

What is the current behavior?

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please check if the following requirements are fulfilled

  • The Breaking Change or Deprecated label has been added
  • The migration steps are described in the following section

What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR? (migration steps)

Other information:

BOUTIER Charly added 2 commits April 3, 2025 18:31
WIP
Signed-off-by: BOUTIER Charly <[email protected]>
@EstherDarkish EstherDarkish changed the title WIP Remove CgmesControlArea WIP Migration powsybl dependencies 2025.0.0 Apr 8, 2025
@EstherDarkish EstherDarkish requested a review from EtienneLt April 8, 2025 09:17
BOUTIER Charly and others added 2 commits April 8, 2025 11:27
Signed-off-by: BOUTIER Charly <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Etienne LESOT <[email protected]>
@EtienneLt EtienneLt changed the title WIP Migration powsybl dependencies 2025.0.0 Migration powsybl dependencies 2025.0.0 Apr 9, 2025
Signed-off-by: Etienne LESOT <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Etienne LESOT <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Etienne LESOT <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Etienne LESOT <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Etienne LESOT <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Etienne LESOT <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Etienne LESOT <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Etienne LESOT <[email protected]>
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ public Resource<D> getNullableResource() {
}

public void setResource(Resource<D> resource) {
idBeforeRemoval = resource == null ? this.resource.getId() : null;
idBeforeRemoval = resource == null && this.resource != null ? this.resource.getId() : null;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@SlimaneAmar I have problems in network store server test if I do not check that

Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
C Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants