fix: rename server package from praxis-proxy-server to praxis#50
Merged
shaneutt merged 2 commits intopraxis-proxy:mainfrom Apr 17, 2026
Merged
fix: rename server package from praxis-proxy-server to praxis#50shaneutt merged 2 commits intopraxis-proxy:mainfrom
shaneutt merged 2 commits intopraxis-proxy:mainfrom
Conversation
Taking a guess the package is intended to be praxis since all of the docs/example configs reference it. Swapped it to praxis to get `cargo run -p xxx` working. Signed-off-by: Brent Salisbury <bsalisbu@redhat.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Renames the workspace’s main server package from praxis-proxy-server to praxis so cargo run -p praxis (and other -p invocations) work consistently with docs and example configs.
No critical or major issues found.
Changes:
- Renamed the
servercrate’s Cargo package name topraxis. - Updated build/test/tooling entrypoints (xtask flamegraph, Makefile, Containerfile) to target
-p praxis. - Updated workspace dependency mapping and lockfile to reflect the rename.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 5 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
xtask/src/benchmark/flamegraph.rs |
Updates profiling build command to target -p praxis. |
server/Cargo.toml |
Renames the server package to praxis. |
Makefile |
Updates unit test target to run cargo test -p praxis. |
Containerfile |
Builds and installs the praxis package/binary in the image. |
Cargo.toml |
Simplifies workspace dep entry now that the package is named praxis. |
Cargo.lock |
Reflects the package rename in the resolved workspace graph. |
shaneutt
approved these changes
Apr 17, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolving the build package name resulting in
which failed with package(s) 'praxis' not found in workspace. Taking a guess the package is intended to be praxis since all of the docs/example configs reference it. Swapped it to praxis to getcargo run -p xxxworking.I went the path of least resistance with the name and files to touch 5 vs. 50. If you want it named praxis-proxy-server just say!
Ty!