Skip to content

Conversation

@bacciotti
Copy link
Contributor

@bacciotti bacciotti commented Jul 24, 2025

Summary by Sourcery

Add consistent PR label handling across deploy scripts to control test runs, enforce smoke-test labeling, and improve logging for non-PR executions.

Enhancements:

  • Add "run-jenkins-tests" label check to skip Konflux deploys and run Jenkins tests instead
  • Add "ok-to-skip-smokes" label check to skip smoke tests in both deploy-iqe-cji.py and deploy.py
  • Enforce the presence of smoke-tests labels when "smokes-required" is set, exiting early if missing
  • Treat missing PR labels or PR number scenario as a nightly/manual test run with updated informational messages

@sourcery-ai
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Jul 24, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

Refactor deployment scripts to centralize and enhance PR label-driven test skipping and enforcement logic across both deploy-iqe-cji.py and deploy.py implementations.

Class diagram for main deployment logic changes

classDiagram
    class DeployIQECJI {
        +pr_labels
        +run()
        +check_cji_jobs()
    }
    class Deploy {
        +labels
        +main()
    }
    DeployIQECJI : +run() updated to centralize label logic
    Deploy : +main() updated to centralize label logic
Loading

Flow diagram for PR label-driven test skipping and enforcement logic

flowchart TD
    A[Start] --> B{Are PR labels present?}
    B -- No --> C[Assume scheduled/manual run]
    C --> D[Proceed with full smoke tests]
    B -- Yes --> E{Label: run-jenkins-tests?}
    E -- Yes --> F[Display: Run Jenkins tests instead of Konflux]
    F --> Z[End]
    E -- No --> G{Label: ok-to-skip-smokes?}
    G -- Yes --> H[Display: Skip smoke tests]
    H --> Z
    G -- No --> I{Label: smokes-required AND missing *smoke-tests label?}
    I -- Yes --> J[Exit: Missing smoke tests labels]
    I -- No --> K[Proceed with deploy/run]
    K --> Z[End]
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Restructure PR label handling in deploy-iqe-cji.py to prioritize test selection
  • Added top-level checks for 'run-jenkins-tests', 'ok-to-skip-smokes', and 'smokes-required' labels
  • Reorganized if-else to distinguish between labeled vs unlabeled runs
  • Removed previous redundant 'ok-to-skip-smokes' branch
files/bin/deploy-iqe-cji.py
Introduce snapshot_components and mirror label-driven logic in deploy.py with koku-specific smoke test enforcement
  • Initialized snapshot_components from snapshot.components
  • Added checks for 'run-jenkins-tests', 'ok-to-skip-smokes', and conditional exit if koku lacks smoke-test labels
  • Updated log messages for clarity on manual/nightly runs
files/bin/deploy.py

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@bacciotti bacciotti enabled auto-merge (squash) July 24, 2025 15:49
Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @bacciotti - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

  • There’s duplicate label‐handling logic in both deploy‐iqe‐cji.py and deploy.py—consider extracting it into a shared utility function to keep behavior in sync and reduce duplicated code.
  • Logging messages vary in style (some use “[INFO]” prefixes and some don’t); it’d be cleaner to standardize on a single format or switch to a proper logging framework.
  • The smoke-tests label validation (the endswith check) could be encapsulated in its own function or config lookup so adding new test labels later is less error-prone.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- There’s duplicate label‐handling logic in both deploy‐iqe‐cji.py and deploy.py—consider extracting it into a shared utility function to keep behavior in sync and reduce duplicated code.
- Logging messages vary in style (some use “[INFO]” prefixes and some don’t); it’d be cleaner to standardize on a single format or switch to a proper logging framework.
- The smoke-tests label validation (the endswith check) could be encapsulated in its own function or config lookup so adding new test labels later is less error-prone.

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@bacciotti bacciotti merged commit 9d9c3c3 into main Jul 24, 2025
1 check passed
@bacciotti bacciotti deleted the put-checks-back branch July 24, 2025 15:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants