Skip to content

Conversation

@esebesto
Copy link
Contributor

@esebesto esebesto commented Nov 4, 2025

This PR addresses a bug where data generation could be skipped when run on the last day of the month.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @esebesto, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves a bug where data generation could be inadvertently skipped when the system was run on the last day of a month. The fix involves refining the logic for calculating the end_date to properly accommodate partial day scenarios, thereby guaranteeing that data processing occurs as expected without interruption.

Highlights

  • Version Update: The project version has been incremented from "5.3.2" to "5.3.3" in nise/__init__.py.
  • Date Calculation Logic Fix: Modified the _load_static_report_data function in nise/__main__.py to correctly handle end_date calculations when the process runs on the last day of the month. This ensures that partial data generation is not skipped due to an incorrect end_date.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to fix a bug that prevented partial data generation on the last day of the month. The changes correctly identify the need to handle this edge case. However, the implementation of the condition to detect this scenario is not fully robust and could lead to incorrect behavior when the script is run on a date that shares the same day number as the last day of a different month in the dataset (e.g., running on March 31st for data from January). I've provided a suggestion to make the date comparison more precise by including year and month checks.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 4, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.4%. Comparing base (1beb84c) to head (2fe3517).

❌ Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (50.0%) is below the target coverage (90.0%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main    #593     +/-   ##
=======================================
- Coverage   93.5%   93.4%   -0.1%     
=======================================
  Files         56      56             
  Lines       4730    4732      +2     
  Branches     663     664      +1     
=======================================
- Hits        4423    4421      -2     
- Misses       165     167      +2     
- Partials     142     144      +2     
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@esebesto
Copy link
Contributor Author

esebesto commented Nov 4, 2025

/gemini review

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly addresses a bug that prevented partial data generation on the last day of the month by ensuring the end date is not prematurely reset to midnight. The logic change in nise/__main__.py is sound. I've added a suggestion to refactor the new conditional logic for improved readability and to remove a redundant timezone replacement. The version bump is also appropriate for this fix.

@esebesto esebesto force-pushed the esebesto/ocp_last_of_the_month branch from feaff90 to 13617fc Compare November 6, 2025 08:12
@esebesto esebesto force-pushed the esebesto/ocp_last_of_the_month branch from 13617fc to 778e690 Compare November 6, 2025 08:18
@esebesto
Copy link
Contributor Author

esebesto commented Nov 6, 2025

/gemini review

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes a bug that prevented partial data generation on the last day of the month by adjusting the end date logic. The change in nise/__main__.py ensures that the calculated end date from the data generators is respected, preventing a scenario where the start date becomes later than the end date. My review includes a suggestion to improve the readability of the new conditional logic.

@esebesto
Copy link
Contributor Author

esebesto commented Nov 6, 2025

/gemini review

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to fix a bug preventing partial data generation on the last day of the month. While the intent is correct, the implementation of the fix introduces a new logical flaw. The condition to decide whether to use a partial day's timestamp is overly complex and can lead to incorrect end dates under certain circumstances, potentially shortening the data generation period unexpectedly. I have provided a review comment with a simplified and more robust code suggestion that correctly addresses the original bug without introducing new issues.

@esebesto
Copy link
Contributor Author

esebesto commented Nov 6, 2025

/gemini review

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes a bug that prevented partial data generation on the last day of the month. The logic change in nise/__main__.py properly handles the end_date to preserve the time component when running on the last day. I've added one suggestion to improve the readability and maintainability of the new date comparison logic. Otherwise, the changes look good.

@esebesto
Copy link
Contributor Author

esebesto commented Nov 6, 2025

/gemini review

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly addresses a bug that could cause data generation to be skipped when run on the last day of the month. The logic to preserve the end time on the last day is sound. I've added one suggestion to refactor the conditional logic for improved readability and to avoid redundant calls, using an assignment expression.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants