Upgrade package transformers due to vulnerability

[pakerimus]

Change Description

This PR upgrades the vulnerable package transformers to 4.53.0..
According to uv-secure:

┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓
┃ Package         ┃ Version       ┃ Vulnerability ID          ┃ Fix Versions   ┃
┡━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┩
│ transformers    │ 4.51.3        │ GHSA-phhr-52qp-3mj4       │ 4.52.1         │
│ transformers    │ 4.51.3        │ GHSA-37mw-44qp-f5jm       │ 4.52.1         │
│ transformers    │ 4.51.3        │ GHSA-9356-575x-2w9m       │ 4.53.0         │
│ transformers    │ 4.51.3        │ GHSA-59p9-h35m-wg4g       │ 4.53.0         │
│ transformers    │ 4.51.3        │ GHSA-rcv9-qm8p-9p6j       │ 4.53.0         │
│ transformers    │ 4.51.3        │ GHSA-4w7r-h757-3r74       │ 4.53.0         │
└─────────────────┴───────────────┴───────────────────────────┴────────────────┘ 

It required to bump the version of optimum and optimum[onnxruntime] to 1.27.0

After pre-commit check failures, claude fixed it for me:

  Fixed Type Errors

  1. transformers_recognizer.py (lines 142-143)

  - Issue: Type mismatch between "ner" task and the expected "zero-shot-object-detection" literal type
  - Fix: Added # type: ignore[arg-type] comments to suppress the type checker error since this is a valid use case with dynamic string types from the transformers library

  2. relevance.py (line 99)

  - Issue: model.onnx_revision is str | None but from_pretrained() expects str
  - Fix: Build the kwargs dictionary conditionally, only adding the revision parameter when it's not None

  3. util.py (line 228)

  - Issue: Invalid escape sequence \* in non-raw string literal
  - Fix: Changed "([^\*]+)" to r"([^\*]+)" to use a raw string

Issue reference

No issue was detected with this

Checklist

• I have reviewed the contribution guidelines
• My code includes unit tests
• All unit tests and lint checks pass locally
• My PR contains documentation updates / additions if required

[Riddhikshah21]

@pakerimus any updates on when this ticket will be resolved? Thank you!

[pakerimus]

@Riddhikshah21 it doesn't depend on me, we need @asofter to review and merge