Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix omission in snow_coverage_nrel #2292

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

cwhanse
Copy link
Member

@cwhanse cwhanse commented Nov 6, 2024

  • Closes snow.coverage_nrel not fully implemented according to reference #1171
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines
  • Tests added
  • Updates entries in docs/sphinx/source/reference for API changes.
  • Adds description and name entries in the appropriate "what's new" file in docs/sphinx/source/whatsnew for all changes. Includes link to the GitHub Issue with :issue:`num` or this Pull Request with :pull:`num`. Includes contributor name and/or GitHub username (link with :ghuser:`user`).
  • New code is fully documented. Includes numpydoc compliant docstrings, examples, and comments where necessary.
  • Pull request is nearly complete and ready for detailed review.
  • Maintainer: Appropriate GitHub Labels (including remote-data) and Milestone are assigned to the Pull Request and linked Issue.

Additional scope if I can get clarity: describe whether snowfall is left- or right-aligned.

@cwhanse cwhanse added the bug label Nov 6, 2024
@cwhanse cwhanse added this to the v0.11.2 milestone Nov 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@IoannisSifnaios IoannisSifnaios left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some ideas from my side. Otherwise looks good to me!

pvlib/snow.py Outdated
Comment on lines 162 to 165
if snow_depth is not None:
# no coverage when there's no snow on the ground
# described in [2] to avoid non-sliding snow for low-tilt systems.
snow_coverage[snow_depth <= 0] = 0.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this check can be applied at the end like this. In cases where the check takes effect (snow_depth = 0 --> coverage = 0), that effect should propagate forward in time and influence values for future timestamps. As it is now, I don't think this code allows that.

See for example this input:

times = pd.date_range("2019-01-01", freq="h", periods=4)
snowfall = pd.Series([10, 0, 0, 0.1], index=times)  # last value is below threshold_snowfall
snow_depth = pd.Series([10, 5, 0, 0.1], index=times)
poa_irradiance = pd.Series(100, index=times)
temp_air = pd.Series(-1, index=times)
surface_tilt = 10

coverage_nrel(snowfall, poa_irradiance, temp_air, surface_tilt, snow_depth)

# output:
2019-01-01 00:00:00    1.000000
2019-01-01 01:00:00    0.965791
2019-01-01 02:00:00    0.000000
2019-01-01 03:00:00    0.897374  # this value doesn't make sense, should be zero

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you are correct. The SAM implementation appears to iterate over timesteps.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the SAM algorithm, these lines set coverage to full if both of two conditions are met:

	if ((snowDepth - previousDepth) >= deltaThreshold*dt && snowDepth >= depthThreshold){
		coverage = 1;
	}

So change in snow depth exceeds deltaThreshold (*dt converts to hourly), and snowDepth exceeds a different threshold so the snow is "sticking" around.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kandersolar I think I've corrected the implementation of the check

times = pd.date_range("2019-01-01", freq="h", periods=4)
snowfall = pd.Series([10, 0, 0, 0.1], index=times)  # last value is below threshold_snowfall
snow_depth = pd.Series([10, 5, 0, 0.1], index=times)
poa_irradiance = pd.Series(100, index=times)
temp_air = pd.Series(-1, index=times)
surface_tilt = 10

coverage_nrel(snowfall, poa_irradiance, temp_air, surface_tilt, snow_depth)

Out[3]: 
2019-01-01 00:00:00    1.000000
2019-01-01 01:00:00    0.965791
2019-01-01 02:00:00    0.000000
2019-01-01 03:00:00    0.000000
Freq: H, dtype: float64

@cwhanse cwhanse modified the milestones: v0.11.2, v0.11.3 Dec 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

snow.coverage_nrel not fully implemented according to reference
3 participants