Tests the new entry points API in pybamm

[medha-14]

No description provided.

[medha-14]

I have created this pull request to test whether the entry point API is working as expected. The example notebook included here is for demonstration purposes and can be refined and added to the PyBaMM repository once approved. Please have a look and suggest any changes if needed.

[agriyakhetarpal]

Thank you! I've launched the workflows.

[medha-14]

Could I get some help with the test_parameter_sets_entry_point_load failure, not sure why the dicts aren’t matching anymore. Only difference I can see is "citations" vs "notcite", am i missing something? What could be causing this?

[agriyakhetarpal]

Hmm, the only source of truth for notcite across both the PyBaMM and pybamm-cookie repositories is here:

pybamm-cookie/template/{{ project_name }}/src/{{project_slug}}/parameters/input/Chen2020.py

Line 370 in f4f2def

"notcite": ["Chen2020"],

Perhaps this can help? I don't recall the context in which this was added, as it has been a while. Perhaps @santacodes does 🤔

[santacodes]

Hmm, the only source of truth for notcite across both the PyBaMM and pybamm-cookie repositories is here:

pybamm-cookie/template/{{ project_name }}/src/{{project_slug}}/parameters/input/Chen2020.py

Line 370 in f4f2def

"notcite": ["Chen2020"],

Perhaps this can help? I don't recall the context in which this was added, as it has been a while. Perhaps @santacodes does 🤔

I don't exactly recall this @agriyakhetarpal, as they worked out of the box when I copied and pasted these parameter values here to test the entry points.

[santacodes]

@medha-14 could you check the failing tests, I think we can merge this once you get the tests passing.

[agriyakhetarpal]

Thanks! Please update the notebook and the source files to use PyBaMM >= 25.8, and we should be good to go. I'll delegate to @santacodes to review the notebook in detail and provide his final go-ahead.