Rewrite sprite collision functions

[aatle]

The current sprite collision functions code has some code repetition. This implementation structures it differently, which has a few effects.

• If dokill is true in spritecollide or groupcollide, the sprites are killed after all colliding sprites have been determined, instead of during iteration (should be unnoticeable)
• As a consequence of the previous thing, in these cases, iteration over group.sprites() is replaced by iteration over group itself, resulting in the following:
  • Avoids a list copy of the group, improving performance slightly in around 1/8 of possible cases
  • It is no longer an error to use a non-group iterable of sprites here (already no error if dokill is False)
    • I advocate for typing the sprite collide functions as supporting all iterables of sprites, instead of just sprite groups
  • "Old-style" groups that don't support iteration raise error now here (already errors if dokill is False)
• It is now easy to implement an ignore_self parameter, e.g., with the new structure

Performance tested in 3.13.0, no regression (similar performance).
Renamed a few local variables for clarity.

[Starbuck5]

I heard somewhere (can't find a back reference) that the old "pull out a bound function into a local variable" trick is actually slower in the most recent versions of Python, I'd be interested to see you look into it with this case.

EDIT: Found it-- https://youtu.be/z0-4EwIFeJo?si=sTOUIHgumGYGiyZl&t=1112

[aatle]

Thanks. I looked into it and found no noticeable performance increase nor penalty from either using sprite_rect.colliderect instead of sprite_rect_collide or spritecollide global instead of sprite_collide_func local, on python 3.13.0.
The most likely thing is that the impact is very minimal. The talk mentions that for pure python methods, the cached method may still be faster by 3% on 3.11.

Since I saw no performance increase from removing the cached methods/functions, I will leave it in just in case python 3.9 or 3.10 needs it.

[MyreMylar]

OK, LGTM 👍

Nice simplification. I renamed the 'crashed' variable because it's name didn't make much sense and this was a good opportunity.

[ankith26]

LGTM, thanks for the PR 🎉

After looking around for a bit trying to think of any case where doing a kill later would change behaviour I have not come up with anything. So I think this is safe to merge