Incorrect scenario of unidiomatic-typecheck #10161

[nedelcu-ioan]

Type of Changes

	Type
✓	🐛 Bug fix

Description

Closes #10161

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.83%. Comparing base (6456374) to head (226c110).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #10170      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.83%   95.83%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         174      174              
  Lines       18995    18993       -2     
==========================================
- Hits        18204    18202       -2     
  Misses        791      791              

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
pylint/checkers/base/comparison_checker.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

[github-actions]

🤖 Effect of this PR on checked open source code: 🤖

Effect on pandas:
The following messages are no longer emitted:

1. unidiomatic-typecheck:
   Use isinstance() rather than type() for a typecheck.
   https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/blob/315b54908bd0dc8a7bc913a38fb22f03377eb6eb/pandas/core/arrays/interval.py#L337
2. unidiomatic-typecheck:
   Use isinstance() rather than type() for a typecheck.
   https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/blob/315b54908bd0dc8a7bc913a38fb22f03377eb6eb/pandas/core/arrays/interval.py#L992
3. unidiomatic-typecheck:
   Use isinstance() rather than type() for a typecheck.
   https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/blob/315b54908bd0dc8a7bc913a38fb22f03377eb6eb/pandas/core/arrays/base.py#L1510
4. unidiomatic-typecheck:
   Use isinstance() rather than type() for a typecheck.
   https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/blob/315b54908bd0dc8a7bc913a38fb22f03377eb6eb/pandas/core/arrays/masked.py#L1112
5. unidiomatic-typecheck:
   Use isinstance() rather than type() for a typecheck.
   https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/blob/315b54908bd0dc8a7bc913a38fb22f03377eb6eb/pandas/core/arrays/arrow/extension_types.py#L43
6. unidiomatic-typecheck:
   Use isinstance() rather than type() for a typecheck.
   https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/blob/315b54908bd0dc8a7bc913a38fb22f03377eb6eb/pandas/core/arrays/arrow/extension_types.py#L97
7. unidiomatic-typecheck:
   Use isinstance() rather than type() for a typecheck.
   https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/blob/315b54908bd0dc8a7bc913a38fb22f03377eb6eb/pandas/core/indexes/base.py#L5538

This comment was generated for commit 226c110

[DanielNoord]

Doesn't the issue say that we don't want to suggest this but only exclude the is and is not comparisons?