Handle deferred evaluation of annotations in Python 3.14

[cdce8p]

Closes #10149

[cdce8p]

We should wait until we can test 3.14 in CI before merging this.

I also don't really like that we need to duplicate a lot of tests. Maybe we can come up with a better solution for dealing conditional errors in our tests.

[Pierre-Sassoulas]

Great !

We should wait until we can test 3.14 in CI before merging this.

Agree, so it's Blocked by pylint-dev/astroid#2731 and then the pylint equivalent.

I also don't really like that we need to duplicate a lot of tests. Maybe we can come up with a better solution for dealing conditional errors in our tests.

Maybe time to design something to be able to expect something different according to the version ?
filename.py

something = 1 # [unused-variable|>=3.13,missing-module-docstring]

With filename.3.14.txt for the expected output of 3.14, filename.txt for the default expected output if the interpreter does not have its specific output file...

[cdce8p]

I also don't really like that we need to duplicate a lot of tests. Maybe we can come up with a better solution for dealing conditional errors in our tests.

Maybe time to design something to be able to expect something different according to the version ? filename.py

something = 1 # [unused-variable|>=3.13,missing-module-docstring]

With filename.3.14.txt for the expected output of 3.14, filename.txt for the default expected output if the interpreter does not have its specific output file...

Explored something like this in #10382. The diff here would look much better, see 379ab07.

[github-actions]

🤖 According to the primer, this change has no effect on the checked open source code. 🤖🎉

This comment was generated for commit 379ab07