Skip to content

Remove uses of NodeNG.doc in favour of doc_node #5905

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2022

Conversation

DanielNoord
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Add yourself to CONTRIBUTORS if you are a new contributor.
  • Write a good description on what the PR does.

Type of Changes

Type
βœ“ πŸ”¨ Refactoring

Description

πŸ˜„

@DanielNoord DanielNoord added the Maintenance Discussion or action around maintaining pylint or the dev workflow label Mar 12, 2022
@DanielNoord DanielNoord added this to the 2.13.0 milestone Mar 12, 2022
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1974119987

  • 14 of 14 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 5 files are covered.
  • 1 unchanged line in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.0004%) to 94.044%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
pylint/checkers/spelling.py 1 76.41%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 1974040115: -0.0004%
Covered Lines: 15048
Relevant Lines: 16001

πŸ’› - Coveralls

@DanielNoord
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Copy link
Member

@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

πŸ‘

@DanielNoord DanielNoord merged commit 849bdda into pylint-dev:main Mar 15, 2022
@DanielNoord DanielNoord deleted the doc branch March 15, 2022 08:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Maintenance Discussion or action around maintaining pylint or the dev workflow
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants