Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

try to write a simpler superoptimization post #121

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

cfbolz
Copy link
Member

@cfbolz cfbolz commented Jul 12, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

@tekknolagi tekknolagi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looking good. there is maybe 5% missing to make things clearer and maybe a sentence or two to add to leave people dangling less at the end

@@ -643,6 +658,8 @@ There are a bunch of problems that come with generalizing the approach:

In the next blog post I'll discuss an alternative approach to simply generating
all possible sequences of instructions, that tries to address these problems.
This works by using the real traces of benchmarks and mine those for
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: parallelism with "using" and "mining"

@cfbolz cfbolz merged commit 8171e20 into main Jul 12, 2024
5 checks passed
@cfbolz cfbolz deleted the z3-trivial-superopt branch July 12, 2024 19:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants