-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
try to write a simpler superoptimization post #121
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looking good. there is maybe 5% missing to make things clearer and maybe a sentence or two to add to leave people dangling less at the end
@@ -643,6 +658,8 @@ There are a bunch of problems that come with generalizing the approach: | |||
|
|||
In the next blog post I'll discuss an alternative approach to simply generating | |||
all possible sequences of instructions, that tries to address these problems. | |||
This works by using the real traces of benchmarks and mine those for |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: parallelism with "using" and "mining"
cc @tekknolagi