-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 573
Reduce memory requirement on export_llama tests with no params #11175
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: gh/jackzhxng/22/base
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
[ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/11175
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 1 New FailureAs of commit 548ef87 with merge base d5c4ba7 ( NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
…rams" [ghstack-poisoned]
@jackzhxng has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
…rams" For some reason, after the previous PR in the stack, test_export_llama_lib was ooming on gh actions CI and I couldn't really figure out why, since I profiled the running memory on the test both before and after they were the same. This addresses fixes the ci oom, and I've been meaning to do this anyway since if we are loading a transformer without params specified, we likely just want to test some basic functionality, so a 1 layer makes more sense than a 8 layer default. Have made sure code elsewhere is not relying on this 8 layer default atm. Differential Revision: [D75498713](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D75498713) [ghstack-poisoned]
Pull Request resolved: #11175 @imported-using-ghimport Differential Revision: [D75498713](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D75498713/) ghstack-source-id: 286576048
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D75498713 |
…rams" For some reason, after the previous PR in the stack, test_export_llama_lib was ooming on gh actions CI and I couldn't really figure out why, since I profiled the running memory on the test both before and after they were the same. This addresses fixes the ci oom, and I've been meaning to do this anyway since if we are loading a transformer without params specified, we likely just want to test some basic functionality, so a 1 layer makes more sense than a 8 layer default. Have made sure code elsewhere is not relying on this 8 layer default atm. Differential Revision: [D75498713](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D75498713) [ghstack-poisoned]
Pull Request resolved: #11175 @imported-using-ghimport Differential Revision: [D75498713](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D75498713/) ghstack-source-id: 287631950
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D75498713 |
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
For some reason, after the previous PR in the stack, test_export_llama_lib was ooming on gh actions CI and I couldn't really figure out why, since I profiled the running memory on the test both before and after they were the same. This addresses fixes the ci oom, and I've been meaning to do this anyway since if we are loading a transformer without params specified, we likely just want to test some basic functionality, so a 1 layer makes more sense than a 8 layer default. Have made sure code elsewhere is not relying on this 8 layer default atm.
Differential Revision: D75498713