Georeferencer updates #9759
Georeferencer updates #9759
Conversation
| @@ -228,6 +230,25 @@ It is possible to choose between five different resampling methods: | |||
| #. Cubic B-Spline (4x4 kernel) | |||
| #. Lanczos (6x6 kernel) | |||
|
|
|||
| Define the Raster creation options | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The raster creation options widget is available in many raster based algorithms (e.g. https://docs.qgis.org/testing/en/docs/user_manual/processing_algs/qgis/rasteranalysis.html#advanced-parameters) and the description of that GUI is mainly at https://docs.qgis.org/testing/en/docs/user_manual/introduction/qgis_configuration.html#gdal-createoptions. So if there are details we want to add about the default profiles, I'd suggest we mention them in the config section instead, so that it benefits to all.
| When exporting a raster, |checkbox| :guilabel:`Raster creation options` allows you to define | ||
| additional options that control how the output file is structured and compressed. | ||
|
|
||
| Under the :guilabel:`Profile` drop-down menu, you can choose between the following options: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Notice that the items below are simply the default options, so you can locally have more items. Or from the widget, selecting the empty entry, you can build your own combination, from scratch.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I removed this part because there wasn’t much new information to include. I just added one Tip and referenced the section on qgis_configuration (gdal createOptions).
| +--------------------------------+------------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+ | ||
| | |addGCPPoint| | Add GCP Point | |deleteGCPPoint| | Delete GCP Point | | ||
| +--------------------------------+------------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+ | ||
| | |moveGCPPoint| | Move GCP Point | |snapping| | Snapping Type | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nothing else to say on snapping?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
OK, I see you just refs the issue report
|
LGTM @selmaVH1
It think it will be good to backport compatible changes to 3.40. We should also think of the placement of the georeferencer chapter in a future PR. Raster chapter doesn't look appropriate. Candidates I can see are (no order below):
|
Yes, but I'm not sure how to handle that backport now, maybe I should create two pull requests one for #7384 and one for other two issues... Any advice?
I was thinking about this, and my idea was to have a standalone chapter after the Managing Data Source or, as you suggested, to include it within the Managing Data Source after the Creating Layers. |
Do it the old simple way, copy-paste the changes in this (these) file(s) to the file(s) in a 3.40 branch and remove what does not belong to that version (i.e. the snapping/cad and the creation options block). |
fixes #9564
fixes #9599
fixes #7384