Skip to content

Dynamic Qubit Allocation and Arrays Workstream#46

Open
qartik wants to merge 9 commits into
qir-alliance:mainfrom
qartik:workstream-dyn-alloc-arrays
Open

Dynamic Qubit Allocation and Arrays Workstream#46
qartik wants to merge 9 commits into
qir-alliance:mainfrom
qartik:workstream-dyn-alloc-arrays

Conversation

@qartik

@qartik qartik commented Jul 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Proposal to start a workstream for addition of Dynamic Qubit Allocation and Arrays to QIR.

See the corresponding spec PR:

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA Assistant Lite bot All Contributors have signed the CLA.

@qartik

qartik commented Jul 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I have read the Contributor License Agreement and I hereby accept the Terms.

@qartik

qartik commented Jul 30, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

About the link checker failure: the links are not broken; GitHub is probably rate-limiting the requests. I can adjust the link checker config to ignore 429 errors, if anyone on the steering committee approves.

Comment thread workstreams/Dynamic_Qubit_Allocation_Arrays.md
Comment thread workstreams/Dynamic_Qubit_Allocation_Arrays.md Outdated
@qartik qartik requested a review from bettinaheim August 29, 2025 12:39
@qartik

qartik commented Sep 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

It might also be worth considering the optimizations discussed in the paper QIRopt: An Optimization Method for Quantum Intermediate Representation by Junjie Luo, Haoyu Zhang, Jianjun Zhao (a previous version is on arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.19592).

@qartik

qartik commented Feb 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@bettinaheim this proposal PR is ready for merge now.

@qartik

qartik commented Feb 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

rest of the CI failure is tackled in #49 and/or #50

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants