Docs: add FidelityStatevectorKernel use case to quantum kernel tutorial - #1070
Open
BoonHow97 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Docs: add FidelityStatevectorKernel use case to quantum kernel tutorial#1070BoonHow97 wants to merge 1 commit into
BoonHow97 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
BoonHow97
requested review from
OkuyanBoga,
adekusar-drl and
oscar-wallis
as code owners
September 4, 2026 09:15
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.
💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
|
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR adds a new section (2.6) to the
03_quantum_kernel.ipynbtutorial demonstrating the use case ofFidelityStatevectorKernel.Details and comments
I’ve drafted section 2.6 with an overview of the use case, performance trade-offs, and caching behavior of
FidelityStatevectorKernel. I also added an example comparing it with an exactFidelityQuantumKernel, verifying that both produce the same kernel matrix while showing their respective evaluation times. The notebook runs successfully locally.Closes #658