Add new tool for scanning repository discussions and generating best …

[mrT23]

User description

…practices

---

PR Type

Enhancement, Documentation

---

Description

• Introduced a new tool /scan_repo_discussions for generating best practices.

• Updated documentation to include details about the new tool.

• Enhanced the README and other docs with updated tool descriptions and images.

• Adjusted configuration and navigation settings for the new tool integration.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Documentation	README.md Added `/scan_repo_discussions` tool announcement and details README.md Added announcement for the new /scan_repo_discussions tool. Updated image and link for the new tool documentation. Adjusted formatting and tool descriptions in the overview table. +48/-48  index.md Updated tools index with `/scan_repo_discussions`                docs/docs/index.md Added /scan_repo_discussions tool to the tools list. Updated tool descriptions to include the new feature. +1/-0      index.md Included `/scan_repo_discussions` in tools overview            docs/docs/tools/index.md Added /scan_repo_discussions tool to the tools list. Provided a brief description of the tool's functionality. +1/-0      scan_repo_discussions.md Added detailed documentation for `/scan_repo_discussions` docs/docs/tools/scan_repo_discussions.md Created a new documentation page for /scan_repo_discussions. Detailed tool usage, configuration options, and examples. Included images to illustrate the tool's output and process. +38/-0
Configuration changes	mkdocs.yml Updated navigation and theme for `/scan_repo_discussions` docs/mkdocs.yml Added /scan_repo_discussions to the navigation menu. Adjusted theme settings and commented out unused features. +4/-3

---

Need help?

Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.

Check out the documentation for more information.

[qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Incorrect Link The link for the "Scan Repo Discussions" tool points to the implement.md file instead of scan_repo_discussions.md | **💎 [Scan Reop Discussions (`/scan_repo_discussions`](./implement.md))** | Generates `best_practices.md` file based on previous discussions in the repository | Note that the tools marked with 💎 are available only for Qodo Merge users. Typo There's a typo in "Scan Reop Discussions" - should be "Scan Repo Discussions" | **💎 [Scan Reop Discussions (`/scan_repo_discussions`](./implement.md))** | Generates `best_practices.md` file based on previous discussions in the repository | Note that the tools marked with 💎 are available only for Qodo Merge users.

[qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Latest suggestions up to a5cb0e4

Category	Suggestion	Impact
General	Restore search plugin functionality The search plugin is commented out, which will disable search functionality on the documentation site. This is inconsistent with having search-related features in the theme configuration. Either uncomment the search plugin or remove the search-related configurations completely. docs/mkdocs.yml [109-112] plugins: - social -# - search + - search - glightbox Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 __ Why: The suggestion identifies an important inconsistency where search-related features are commented out in the theme configuration while the search plugin itself is also commented out. Restoring the search plugin is important for documentation site functionality.	Medium
	✅ Remove duplicate configuration entry Suggestion Impact: The commit removed the duplicate 'content.tabs.link' entry from the configuration list, exactly as suggested code diff: - - content.tabs.link The content.tabs.link feature is duplicated in the list. Remove the duplicate entry to avoid potential configuration issues. docs/mkdocs.yml [82-86] # - search.suggest # - search.highlight - content.tabs.link - content.code.annotation - content.code.copy -- content.tabs.link [To ensure code accuracy, apply this suggestion manually] Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a duplicate entry for 'content.tabs.link' in the configuration list. Removing the duplicate improves code quality and prevents potential configuration issues.	Medium
Update

---

Previous suggestions

✅ Suggestions up to commit 7704379

Category	Suggestion	Impact
Possible issue	✅ Fix incorrect documentation link Suggestion Impact: The commit fixed the documentation link for the Scan Repo Discussions tool, changing it from './implement.md' to './scan_repo_discussions.md' as suggested code diff: -| **💎 [Scan Reop Discussions (`/scan_repo_discussions`](./implement.md))** | Generates `best_practices.md` file based on previous discussions in the repository | +| **💎 [Scan Repo Discussions (`/scan_repo_discussions`](./scan_repo_discussions.md))** | Generates `best_practices.md` file based on previous discussions in the repository | The link to the documentation for the Scan Repo Discussions tool points to the implementation tool page (./implement.md) instead of the correct scan_repo_discussions.md page. This will lead users to the wrong documentation. docs/docs/tools/index.md [22] -| **💎 [Scan Reop Discussions (`/scan_repo_discussions`](./implement.md))** | Generates `best_practices.md` file based on previous discussions in the repository | +| **💎 [Scan Repo Discussions (`/scan_repo_discussions`](./scan_repo_discussions.md))** | Generates `best_practices.md` file based on previous discussions in the repository | [Suggestion has been applied] Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 __ Why: The link to the Scan Repo Discussions tool documentation incorrectly points to "implement.md" instead of "scan_repo_discussions.md". This is a critical navigation issue that would lead users to the wrong documentation page, affecting usability.	High
Learned best practice	Include error handling information for configuration parameters to prevent runtime errors when invalid values are provided The configuration options don't include any validation or error handling guidance. It's important to mention what happens if users provide invalid values (like negative numbers or non-numeric input) for the configuration parameters. Add information about input validation and error handling to prevent runtime errors. docs/docs/tools/scan_repo_discussions.md [37-38] -- Use `/scan_repo_discussions --scan_repo_discussions.days_back=X` to specify the number of days back to scan for discussions. The default is 365 days. -- Use `/scan_repo_discussions --scan_repo_discussions.minimal_number_of_prs=X` to specify the minimum number of merged PRs needed to generate the `best_practices.md` file. The default is 50 PRs. +- Use `/scan_repo_discussions --scan_repo_discussions.days_back=X` to specify the number of days back to scan for discussions. The default is 365 days. If a negative or non-numeric value is provided, the default will be used. +- Use `/scan_repo_discussions --scan_repo_discussions.minimal_number_of_prs=X` to specify the minimum number of merged PRs needed to generate the `best_practices.md` file. The default is 50 PRs. If a negative or non-numeric value is provided, the default will be used. Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6	Low