docs: add GPT-5.1 benchmark results to PR benchmark documentation

[ofir-frd]

PR Type

Documentation

---

Description

• Add GPT-5.1 benchmark results to model comparison table

• Include detailed analysis section for GPT-5.1 model performance

• Update section header to clarify latest additions focus

• Remove outdated Claude-4 and GPT-4.1 benchmark entries

---

Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["Benchmark Table"] -->|"Add GPT-5.1 row"| B["Updated Model Comparison"]
  C["Results Analysis Section"] -->|"Add GPT-5.1 analysis"| D["Enhanced Documentation"]
  E["Outdated Entries"] -->|"Remove Claude-4 & GPT-4.1"| F["Cleaned Results"]

Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files

Documentation

index.md Add GPT-5.1 benchmark and remove outdated models                  docs/docs/pr_benchmark/index.md Add GPT-5.1 model row to benchmark comparison table with score 44.9 Insert comprehensive GPT-5.1 analysis section covering strengths and weaknesses Update "Results Analysis" header to "Results Analysis (Latest Additions)" Remove outdated Claude-4 Sonnet and GPT-4.1 benchmark result sections +23/-55

---

[qodo-merge-for-open-source]

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

(Compliance updated until commit 0bbad14)

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢	No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
⚪	🎫 No ticket provided Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
⚪	Codebase context is not defined Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Custom Compliance
🟢	Consistent Naming Conventions Objective: All new variables, functions, and classes must follow the project's established naming standards Status: Passed
	No Dead or Commented-Out Code Objective: Keep the codebase clean by ensuring all submitted code is active and necessary Status: Passed
	Robust Error Handling Objective: Ensure potential errors and edge cases are anticipated and handled gracefully throughout the code Status: Passed
	Single Responsibility for Functions Objective: Each function should have a single, well-defined responsibility Status: Passed
	When relevant, utilize early return Objective: In a code snippet containing multiple logic conditions (such as 'if-else'), prefer an early return on edge cases than deep nesting Status: Passed

Compliance status legend

🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

---

Previous compliance checks

Compliance check up to commit 0bbad14

Security Compliance
🟢	No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
⚪	🎫 No ticket provided Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
⚪	Codebase context is not defined Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Custom Compliance
🟢	Consistent Naming Conventions Objective: All new variables, functions, and classes must follow the project's established naming standards Status: Passed
	No Dead or Commented-Out Code Objective: Keep the codebase clean by ensuring all submitted code is active and necessary Status: Passed
	Robust Error Handling Objective: Ensure potential errors and edge cases are anticipated and handled gracefully throughout the code Status: Passed
	Single Responsibility for Functions Objective: Each function should have a single, well-defined responsibility Status: Passed
	When relevant, utilize early return Objective: In a code snippet containing multiple logic conditions (such as 'if-else'), prefer an early return on edge cases than deep nesting Status: Passed

[qodo-merge-for-open-source]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.