refactor: refactor lookup zone by denom #1198
Conversation
minhngoc274
requested review from
joe-bowman,
faddat and
tuantran1702
as code owners
WalkthroughThe update focuses on enhancing the efficiency of denom-to-zone lookups in the interchain staking module by introducing a mapping system. This system allows for quicker retrieval of zone information based on denom, eliminating the need for iterative searches. Key changes include the addition of functions and a key prefix to manage these mappings, and an update to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (5)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/keeper_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/msg_server.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/zones.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/types/keys.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 6
x/interchainstaking/types/keys.go (1)
- 65-65: The addition of
KeyPrefixLocalDenomZoneMappingfollows the established pattern for defining key prefixes and is correctly implemented. This change is crucial for the performance improvements described, enabling efficient zone lookups by denomination.x/interchainstaking/keeper/msg_server.go (1)
- 39-39: The update to use
GetZoneAndUpdateMappingIfNeededfor zone retrieval in theRequestRedemptionfunction is a significant improvement. It aligns with the PR's objectives to enhance performance by replacing iterative zone lookups with efficient mapping-based retrievals. This change should ensure faster and more reliable zone lookups.x/interchainstaking/keeper/zones.go (1)
- 499-500: The addition of
k.DeleteDenomZoneMapping(ctx, zone.LocalDenom)within theRemoveZoneAndAssociatedRecordsfunction is a crucial step towards maintaining the integrity of the new mapping system by ensuring that denom to zone mappings are cleaned up alongside the zones themselves. This change aligns with the PR's objectives of improving lookup efficiency by preventing orphaned mappings that could degrade performance over time.However, it's important to ensure that the
DeleteDenomZoneMappingfunction handles edge cases gracefully, such as attempting to delete a mapping that does not exist. Additionally, considering the broader impact of this change on the system's performance and reliability is essential. If not already covered, adding tests to verify the correct behavior ofDeleteDenomZoneMappingunder various scenarios, including edge cases, would be beneficial to ensure the robustness of this implementation.x/interchainstaking/keeper/keeper.go (2)
- 222-233: The function
GetLocalDenomZoneMappingis well-implemented, providing a straightforward way to retrieve a zone by denom from the mapping. A few points to note:
- The function correctly handles the case where the denom is not found in the mapping by returning
nil, false, which is good practice for indicating the absence of a value.- The use of
prefix.NewStoreandKeyPrefixLocalDenomZoneMappingensures that the mapping is stored efficiently and is namespaced appropriately within the KV store.This function is correctly implemented and follows best practices for KV store access and error handling.
- 242-246: The
DeleteDenomZoneMappingfunction is straightforward and correctly implements the deletion of a denom to zone mapping from the KV store. A few points to note:
- The function uses
prefix.NewStoreandKeyPrefixLocalDenomZoneMappingconsistently with other mapping-related functions, which is good for maintainability.- There are no checks or feedback mechanisms for the case where the denom does not exist in the mapping. While this is not strictly necessary, it might be useful in certain contexts to know whether the deletion was "successful" in terms of actually removing an existing entry.
This function is correctly implemented for its intended purpose. Consider adding feedback mechanisms if the context requires knowing the existence of a mapping before deletion.
x/interchainstaking/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
- 747-774: The
TestLocalDenomZoneMappingfunction is well-structured and covers the essential aspects of testing the local denom to zone mapping functionality. It checks for the non-existence of a mapping, the creation of a mapping upon retrieval, and the deletion of the mapping. This test ensures that the mapping functionality works as expected, which is crucial for the performance improvements mentioned in the PR objectives.However, it would be beneficial to add assertions to verify the correctness of the zone returned by
GetZoneAndUpdateMappingIfNeededagainst the expected zone. This would strengthen the test by not only checking the existence of the mapping but also ensuring that the correct zone is mapped to the given local denom.
|
Handle upgrades V010600UpgradeName, iterate zones and add to denom <-> zone mapping. Will do it when the PR#1184 been merged |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/keeper.go
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1198 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 63.13% 63.17% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 171 171
Lines 11205 11229 +24
==========================================
+ Hits 7074 7094 +20
- Misses 3412 3414 +2
- Partials 719 721 +2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/keeper_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/msg_server.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/keeper.go
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/keeper_test.go
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/msg_server.go
1. Summary
Fixes #993
2.Type of change
3. Implementation details
4. How to test/use
5. Checklist
6. Limitations (optional)
7. Future Work (optional)
Handle upgrades V010600UpgradeName, iterate zones and add to denom <-> zone mapping
Summary by CodeRabbit