Add registry provider to UI components #1705
Conversation
WalkthroughThis set of changes introduces a centralized registry management system via a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant InputRegistryUrl
participant RegistryManager
participant loadRegistryUrl
participant Window
User->>InputRegistryUrl: Enter registry URL and click "Load"
InputRegistryUrl->>RegistryManager: getCurrentRegistry()
InputRegistryUrl->>loadRegistryUrl: loadRegistryUrl(newURL, registryManager)
loadRegistryUrl->>RegistryManager: setRegistry(newURL)
loadRegistryUrl->>Window: reload()
sequenceDiagram
participant RootLayout
participant RegistryProvider
participant RegistryManager
participant ChildComponent
RootLayout->>RegistryManager: new RegistryManager(defaultURL)
RootLayout->>RegistryProvider: registryManager
RegistryProvider->>ChildComponent: provide registry context
ChildComponent->>RegistryManager: useRegistry() (via context)
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
packages/webapp/src/routes/deploy/+layout.ts (1)
16-40: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Consider explicitly typing the load function return
The
loadfunction could benefit from an explicit return type using the newly definedLoadResulttype.-export const load: LayoutLoad = async ({ url }) => { +export const load: LayoutLoad<LoadResult> = async ({ url }) => {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (21)
packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/InputRegistryUrl.test.ts(2 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/lib/__mocks__/stores.ts(3 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/lib/components/deployment/DeploymentSteps.svelte(3 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/lib/components/input/InputRegistryUrl.svelte(1 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/lib/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/RegistryManager.ts(1 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/RegistryProvider.svelte(1 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/context.ts(1 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/useRegistry.ts(1 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/lib/services/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/lib/services/loadRegistryUrl.test.ts(1 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/lib/services/loadRegistryUrl.ts(1 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/lib/types/registry.ts(1 hunks)packages/ui-components/test-setup.ts(1 hunks)packages/webapp/src/__tests__/DepositOrWithdrawModal.test.ts(1 hunks)packages/webapp/src/__tests__/OrderRemoveModal.test.ts(1 hunks)packages/webapp/src/__tests__/handleGuiInitialization.test.ts(1 hunks)packages/webapp/src/routes/deploy/+layout.svelte(1 hunks)packages/webapp/src/routes/deploy/+layout.ts(8 hunks)packages/webapp/src/routes/deploy/+page.svelte(1 hunks)packages/webapp/test-setup.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/services/index.ts (1)
Learnt from: hardingjam
PR: rainlanguage/rain.orderbook#1565
File: packages/webapp/src/lib/services/loadRegistryUrl.ts:21-95
Timestamp: 2025-04-09T12:57:52.799Z
Learning: In the loadRegistryUrl function, invalid URL format validation is handled by the fetchRegistryDotrains function rather than explicit URL format validation within loadRegistryUrl itself. The error handling in the catch block will handle any failures from the fetch operation.
packages/ui-components/src/lib/services/loadRegistryUrl.ts (1)
Learnt from: hardingjam
PR: rainlanguage/rain.orderbook#1565
File: packages/webapp/src/lib/services/loadRegistryUrl.ts:21-95
Timestamp: 2025-04-09T12:57:52.799Z
Learning: In the loadRegistryUrl function, invalid URL format validation is handled by the fetchRegistryDotrains function rather than explicit URL format validation within loadRegistryUrl itself. The error handling in the catch block will handle any failures from the fetch operation.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (8)
packages/ui-components/test-setup.ts (1)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/__mocks__/stores.ts (1)
mockRegistryStore(166-170)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/services/loadRegistryUrl.ts (2)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/services/index.ts (2)
loadRegistryUrl(2-2)fetchRegistryDotrains(1-1)packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/RegistryManager.ts (1)
RegistryManager(4-148)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/useRegistry.ts (2)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/context.ts (1)
getRegistryContext(15-23)packages/ui-components/src/lib/types/registry.ts (1)
RegistryStore(4-4)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/types/registry.ts (1)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/RegistryManager.ts (1)
RegistryManager(4-148)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/__mocks__/stores.ts (2)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/index.ts (1)
RegistryManager(136-136)packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/RegistryManager.ts (1)
RegistryManager(4-148)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/context.ts (2)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/index.ts (1)
RegistryManager(136-136)packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/RegistryManager.ts (1)
RegistryManager(4-148)
packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/InputRegistryUrl.test.ts (2)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/__mocks__/stores.ts (2)
mockRegistryStore(166-170)initialRegistry(13-23)packages/ui-components/src/lib/services/loadRegistryUrl.ts (1)
loadRegistryUrl(4-24)
packages/webapp/src/routes/deploy/+layout.ts (3)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/services/registry.ts (3)
RegistryDotrain(10-13)fetchRegistryDotrains(56-77)validateStrategies(79-119)packages/ui-components/src/lib/index.ts (2)
ValidStrategyDetail(87-87)InvalidStrategyDetail(87-87)packages/webapp/src/lib/constants.ts (1)
REGISTRY_URL(1-2)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/RegistryManager.ts
[error] 46-47: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 62-63: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 79-79: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 112-113: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 135-136: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-rs-artifacts, true)
🔇 Additional comments (57)
packages/webapp/src/__tests__/OrderRemoveModal.test.ts (1)
7-13: Improved mocking strategy for orderbook moduleThe change from a static mock to an asynchronous mock that preserves original exports is a significant improvement. This approach ensures that only the necessary function (
getRemoveOrderCalldata) is mocked while keeping the rest of the module's functionality intact.packages/webapp/src/__tests__/DepositOrWithdrawModal.test.ts (1)
19-27: Good implementation of selective mockingThe updated mock correctly preserves all original exports while only overriding specific calldata-related functions. This approach maintains the integrity of the module's other functionality during testing.
packages/webapp/test-setup.ts (1)
10-10: Removal of global mock improves test isolationRemoving the global mock for
@rainlanguage/orderbookis appropriate as it's been replaced with more specific, targeted mocks in individual test files. This change promotes better test isolation and more explicit dependencies.packages/webapp/src/__tests__/handleGuiInitialization.test.ts (1)
6-13: Proper test-specific mocking of DotrainOrderGuiThe explicit mocking of
DotrainOrderGuiand its prototype methods provides clear visibility into what's being tested and how the dependencies are controlled. This local mock definition is more maintainable than relying on global mocks.packages/ui-components/src/lib/services/index.ts (1)
2-2: Good addition of registry service export.This export provides access to the new registry URL loading functionality from other components, supporting the centralized registry URL management as described in the PR objectives.
packages/ui-components/src/lib/types/registry.ts (1)
1-4: Clean type definition for the registry store.The
RegistryStoretype properly defines a Svelte Readable store containing aRegistryManagerinstance, facilitating type-safe access to the registry throughout the component tree.packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/RegistryProvider.svelte (1)
1-10: Well-implemented registry context provider.This Svelte component follows the provider pattern correctly, accepting a registry store and making it available to child components through Svelte's context API. The implementation is minimal and focused on its single responsibility.
packages/ui-components/test-setup.ts (1)
3-10: Good test setup for registry functionality.The mock implementation for the registry hook is consistent with the existing mocking patterns in the file and will properly support testing components that use the registry system.
packages/ui-components/src/lib/components/deployment/DeploymentSteps.svelte (3)
30-30: Good integration of the registry provider system.The import of
useRegistryhook aligns with the new centralized registry management approach.
61-61: LGTM: Proper hook initialization.The hook is correctly initialized and will make the registry available throughout the component.
154-156: Correctly implemented dynamic registry URL retrieval.The component now properly gets the registry URL dynamically through the registry provider system instead of using a static URL. This is a good refactoring that centralizes registry URL management.
packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/useRegistry.ts (2)
4-12: Well-implemented registry hook.The hook correctly retrieves the registry context from Svelte's context system. The function is simple, focused, and follows the hook pattern appropriately.
14-38: Good test coverage for the hook.The tests properly mock the context and verify both the function call and returned value. This ensures the hook works as expected in isolation.
packages/ui-components/src/lib/services/loadRegistryUrl.ts (1)
4-24:❌ Incorrect review comment
Consider a more controlled approach to page reloading.
The function correctly validates inputs, fetches registry data, and updates the registry manager. However, forcing a full page reload with
window.location.reload()can be jarring for users and loses application state.Based on the retrieved learning, I can see URL validation is handled by
fetchRegistryDotrains, which is good.Consider a more controlled approach:
export async function loadRegistryUrl( url: string, registryManager: RegistryManager ): Promise<void> { if (!url) { throw new Error('No URL provided'); } if (!registryManager) { throw new Error('Registry manager is required'); } try { await fetchRegistryDotrains(url); registryManager.setRegistry(url); - window.location.reload(); + // Return success and let caller decide how to update UI + return; } catch (e) { const errorMessage = e instanceof Error ? e.message : 'Failed to update registry URL'; throw new Error(errorMessage); } }Components using this function could then handle UI updates in a more controlled way, such as showing a success message before redirecting or refreshing only certain parts of the UI.
Are there components that expect the page to reload after registry changes? This would help determine if this change is feasible.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Find components that use loadRegistryUrl to understand how they handle registry changes rg -A 10 "loadRegistryUrl" --type svelteLength of output: 71
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all usages of loadRegistryUrl across the codebase without file-type filtering rg -n "loadRegistryUrl" .Length of output: 2875
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Display the InputRegistryUrl.svelte component to review how it handles loadRegistryUrl calls sed -n '1,100p' packages/ui-components/src/lib/components/input/InputRegistryUrl.svelteLength of output: 1320
Keep the full-page reload for registry URL changes
The forced reload in
loadRegistryUrlis intentional and required to reinitialize application state (per our existing behavior in+layout.svelte). Removingwindow.location.reload()would leave stale state in the app, since no other code triggers a fresh bootstrap after the registry URL is updated.
- Leave the call to
window.location.reload()inpackages/ui-components/src/lib/services/loadRegistryUrl.tsas is.- Components (like
InputRegistryUrl.svelte) rely on that reload to fully apply the new registry URL across the app.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
packages/ui-components/src/lib/index.ts (1)
128-128: Well-organized exports for the new registry system.The exports are properly organized by category (Providers, Hooks, Classes) and make the registry management system available as part of the public API. This allows consumers to use the registry provider, access hook, and manager class when needed.
Also applies to: 133-136
packages/ui-components/src/lib/services/loadRegistryUrl.test.ts (8)
1-7: Good test setup with clear imports and dependencies.The test suite has all the necessary imports and properly sets up the test environment for the
loadRegistryUrlfunction. The inclusion of theinitialRegistrymock from the stores file is particularly good as it helps isolate tests.
8-13: Well-structured dependency mocking.The mock setup for the
fetchRegistryDotrainsfunction is clean and follows best practices by usingvi.fn()to create spy functions that can be asserted against later in the tests.
14-23: Good test initialization with proper cleanup.The test suite properly resets mocks and resets the global window.location object between tests, which prevents test pollution. The explicit type casting approach with comments acknowledging the explicit any is a reasonable approach for testing environment setup.
24-27: LGTM: Validation test for missing URL parameter.This test correctly verifies that the function rejects with an appropriate error message when no URL is provided.
29-33: LGTM: Validation test for missing registry manager.This test correctly verifies that the function rejects when the registry manager is not provided.
35-44: LGTM: Comprehensive success case testing.This test covers the happy path thoroughly by verifying that:
- The fetch function is called with the correct URL
- The registry manager's setRegistry method is called with the correct URL
- The page reload is triggered after a successful update
46-59: LGTM: Good error handling test for Error objects.This test properly verifies that:
- Errors from fetchRegistryDotrains are propagated
- The registry is not updated when an error occurs
- The page is not reloaded on error
61-75: LGTM: Thorough test for non-Error exception handling.This test covers the important edge case of handling non-Error rejections (like strings), which can happen in JavaScript. The test verifies that:
- A generic error message is thrown
- The registry is not updated
- The page is not reloaded
This is essential for robust error handling.
packages/ui-components/src/lib/components/input/InputRegistryUrl.svelte (5)
3-4: LGTM: Good imports for the registry provider pattern.Importing the
useRegistryhook andloadRegistryUrlservice follows good separation of concerns, replacing direct DOM/localStorage manipulation with a centralized registry management approach.
6-9: LGTM: Clean state initialization.The component properly:
- Gets the registry store using the hook
- Initializes the input with the current registry URL
- Sets up state variables for error handling and loading indication
11-23: LGTM: Well-implemented async click handler with proper error handling.The
handleClickfunction follows best practices for async operations:
- Sets loading state at the beginning
- Clears previous errors
- Uses try/catch for error handling
- Handles both Error objects and unknown error types
- Resets loading state in all cases
- Verifies registry availability before proceeding
26-37: LGTM: Clean UI layout with proper feedback states.The UI structure is well organized:
- Uses flex layout for proper alignment
- Includes a data-testid attribute for testing
- Provides a visual loading indicator in the button
- Disables the button during loading to prevent multiple submissions
38-42: LGTM: Good error message display.The error display section is well implemented:
- Maintains consistent height with a fixed placeholder div
- Uses conditional rendering to show errors only when present
- Includes a data-testid attribute for testing the error state
- Uses appropriate color for error messages
packages/webapp/src/routes/deploy/+page.svelte (6)
3-3: LGTM: Import page store for data access.Importing the Svelte page store aligns with Svelte's pattern for accessing page data and simplifies the component by removing the need for props.
5-5: LGTM: Clean data destructuring from page store.Destructuring the required data from
$page.datamakes the code more readable and ensures that only the needed data is extracted.
10-17: LGTM: Improved information section placement.Moving the information section outside the conditional blocks ensures it's always visible, which improves the user experience by providing consistent context about Raindex and Rainlang.
19-22: LGTM: Enhanced error message with test ID.The error display now includes a data-testid attribute, which makes it easier to test the error state in automated tests.
23-24: LGTM: Added empty state messaging.Adding a specific message for when no strategies are found (with no error) improves the user experience by providing clear feedback.
26-31: LGTM: Cleaner conditional rendering for strategy sections.Using nested conditional blocks for each strategy section makes the code more maintainable and ensures that sections are only rendered when they have content.
packages/ui-components/src/lib/__mocks__/stores.ts (5)
7-9: LGTM: Added imports for registry mocking.Adding the necessary imports for
RegistryManagerand Vitest's mocking utilities prepares the file for implementing registry mocks.
10-12: LGTM: Good mock state initialization.Setting up mock constants for the default and current registry URLs creates a clear initial state for tests and makes the mock behavior predictable.
13-23: LGTM: Comprehensive mock implementation of RegistryManager.The
initialRegistrymock provides implementations for all the key methods of theRegistryManagerclass:
getCurrentRegistryreturns the current or default URLsetRegistryupdates the mock stateresetToDefaultresets to the default URLupdateUrlWithRegistryis stubbed for verificationisCustomRegistryprovides realistic logicThis enables thorough testing of components that interact with the registry.
58-58: LGTM: Mock registry store setup.Creating a Svelte writable store initialized with the mock registry manager follows the same pattern as the other stores in this file.
166-170: LGTM: Complete registry store mock API.The
mockRegistryStoreexports the necessary methods for subscription, setting, and updating the mock registry store, making it easy to use in tests.packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/InputRegistryUrl.test.ts (6)
7-9: Well-structured test setup using vi.hoistedThe hoisted import ensures the mocks are defined before tests run, making them available for vi.mock to use.
10-13: Clean mock implementation of loadRegistryUrl serviceGood approach to mock the service function, making it easy to control its behavior in different test scenarios.
37-49: Test thoroughly verifies loadRegistryUrl interactionGood test case that verifies both user interaction and the service call with the correct parameters.
51-58: Well-crafted test for initial registry valueThe test properly mocks the getCurrentRegistry method and verifies the input is initialized with the correct value.
60-69: Good error handling test caseThe error case appropriately tests both the error triggering and the subsequent UI feedback to the user.
71-96: Comprehensive loading state testThis test is thorough in verifying the component's loading state behavior, including:
- Using fake timers to control timing
- Checking loading message display
- Verifying button disabled state
- Confirming return to normal state after loading completes
Excellent attention to the complete user experience.
packages/webapp/src/routes/deploy/+layout.svelte (3)
3-8: Good organization of importsClean import structure with named imports properly grouped.
16-18: Registry manager initialization and reactive bindingThe registry manager is properly created and wrapped in a store for reactivity.
21-47: Well-structured registry provider with conditional renderingThe RegistryProvider component is properly implemented with conditional rendering based on registry state and current page. The structure allows for:
- Showing/hiding the custom registry warning based on registry state
- Toggling advanced mode only on the deploy page
- Displaying the InputRegistryUrl component with transitions when in advanced mode
packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/RegistryManager.ts (2)
1-21: Good class structure with clear documentationThe class is well-structured with appropriate private fields and JSDoc comments explaining the purpose of each method and property.
145-147: Robust custom registry checkGood implementation of the
isCustomRegistrymethod with a proper null check and comparison.packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/context.ts (3)
15-23: Well-implemented context getter with helpful error messageThe
getRegistryContextfunction appropriately checks for missing context and provides a clear error message that guides the developer on how to fix the issue.
28-30: Simple and effective context setterThe
setRegistryContextfunction is properly implemented to store the registry in Svelte's context.
32-68: Comprehensive inline testsExcellent use of Vitest's inline testing capabilities to test the context functions. The tests cover both success and error cases.
packages/webapp/src/routes/deploy/+layout.ts (4)
4-6: Good import organizationThe separation of type imports from value imports improves code readability. This follows best practices for TypeScript organization.
16-17: Clear variable renaming improves code clarityRenaming
registrytoregistryFromUrlmakes the code more explicit about what this variable represents - the registry URL from the query parameter or default value.
89-89: Consistent variable name updates in testsAll test expectations have been properly updated to use the new
registryFromUrlnaming, maintaining consistency throughout the file.Also applies to: 105-105, 121-121, 140-140, 153-153, 177-177
55-61:✅ Verification successful
New RegistryManager mock added for tests
Adding the mock for the RegistryManager service is good for test reliability. This appears to be part of the broader registry management refactoring mentioned in the PR summary.
🌐 Web query:
What is the purpose of the SvelteKit layout.ts load function?💡 Result:
Purpose of the SvelteKit
+layout.tsLoad FunctionThe
loadfunction exported from a SvelteKit+layout.ts(or+layout.js) file serves as a centralized data-fetching mechanism for a layout component and all its descendant pages and layouts within the same routing branch.Key purposes and behaviors:
Fetch Shared Data:
The+layout.tsload function allows you to fetch and provide data that is needed by multiple child pages under the same layout. This avoids data duplication and ensures consistency across sections like user authentication info, navigation menus, or other shared resources[2][8].Pre-Render Data Loading:
The data returned by theloadfunction is made available to the associated+layout.sveltecomponent via thedataprop before it or any of its children are rendered. This enables components to access necessary data upfront[5][8].Data Availability to Descendants:
All child pages and layouts under the same route branch can access the data returned from a parent layout's load function. This is particularly useful for initializing app-wide state, fetching API tokens, or setting up global site information[2][7][8].Reactivity and Efficient Data Fetching:
The load function only re-runs when necessary—such as when navigating outside the current layout's scope or when dependencies (e.g., route params) change. This ensures efficient data-fetching and avoids unnecessary reloads of shared data[4][8].Access to Load Event Context:
The function receives aLoadEventobject, giving access to route parameters, query strings, cookies, and more, allowing context-aware data loading for the layout and its children[5].Types of Load Functions:
+layout.ts: Universal load function running on both server and client (depending on navigation).+layout.server.ts: Runs exclusively on the server, useful for accessing server-only secrets or protected APIs[5][8].Example Use Cases:
- Providing user authentication status or preferences to all pages within a dashboard section.
- Serving a shared navigation menu or site settings to a set of pages.
- Preloading data that multiple child pages will consume, preventing duplicate network requests.
Summary Table
Aspect +layout.tsLoad Function PurposeScope Parent layout and all descendant routes When it runs Before layout/child pages render; re-runs on relevant navigation events Common uses Shared data: user info, navigation, API tokens Data access in children Via dataprop in Svelte componentsUniversal/Server option Runs on client, server, or both depending on file naming and navigation type Avoids Redundant data fetching in individual pages In short, the
+layout.tsload function is a powerful feature in SvelteKit for efficient, context-aware, and shared data provision across multiple routes, streamlining data needs for grouped sections of your app[2][8].Citations:
- 1: https://svelte.dev/docs/kit/load
- 2: https://scottspence.com/posts/sveltekit-data-loading-understanding-the-load-function
- 3: https://svelte.dev/tutorial/kit/layout-data
- 4: Load function re-runs on every navigation even if when I not intend it to sveltejs/kit#9155
- 5: https://www.okupter.com/blog/sveltekit-internals-load-function
- 6: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQL3stj6_H0
- 7: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoMCbyPr8PE
- 8: https://svelte.dev/docs/kit/routing
- 9: https://dev.to/theether0/sveltekit-load-function-behavior-changes-3kb6
- 10: Are `+layout.server.ts` loads meant to rerun on every child route change? sveltejs/kit#10386
Approve: Mocking RegistryManager for layout load tests is appropriate
The SvelteKit
+layout.tsloadfunction fetches shared registry data for this layout and all its child routes. By mockingRegistryManagerhere, you prevent real storage calls and ensure reliable, side-effect-free tests—exactly what’s needed given the registry-management refactor.• File:
packages/webapp/src/routes/deploy/+layout.ts
• Lines: 55–61
• Snippet:vi.mock('$lib/services/RegistryManager', () => ({ default: { isCustomRegistry: vi.fn(), setToStorage: vi.fn(), clearFromStorage: vi.fn() } }));No further changes required.
| public updateUrlWithRegistry(value: string | null = this.currentRegistry): void { | ||
| try { | ||
| const url = new URL(window.location.href); | ||
| if (value) { | ||
| url.searchParams.set(RegistryManager.STORAGE_KEY, value); | ||
| } else { | ||
| url.searchParams.delete(RegistryManager.STORAGE_KEY); | ||
| } | ||
| window.history.pushState({}, '', url.toString()); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| throw new Error( | ||
| 'Failed to update URL parameter: ' + | ||
| (error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)) | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider additional URL validation
The updateUrlWithRegistry method doesn't validate if the URL is properly formatted before attempting to manipulate it.
Consider adding validation for the registry URL format either here or in setRegistry to prevent issues with invalid URLs.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 135-136: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/RegistryManager.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| 'Failed to get registry parameter: ' + | ||
| (error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)) | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Use template literals instead of string concatenation
String concatenation is used in several error messages. Template literals would be more readable.
For example:
- throw new Error(
- 'Failed to get registry parameter: ' +
- (error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error))
- );
+ throw new Error(
+ `Failed to get registry parameter: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`
+ );Apply similar changes to all other string concatenations in error messages.
Also applies to: 62-64, 79-79, 112-114, 135-137
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all instances of string concatenation in error messages
rg -A 1 "throw new Error\(" packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/RegistryManager.tsLength of output: 485
Use template literals for error messages
String concatenation in error messages reduces readability and consistency. Convert these to template literals.
Locations needing updates:
- packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/RegistryManager.ts:
- Lines 46–48: Failed to get registry parameter
- Lines 62–64: Failed to save to localStorage
- Line 79: Failed to access localStorage
- Lines 112–114: Failed to clear registry from localStorage
- Lines 135–137: Failed to update URL parameter
Example diff (apply similarly to each case):
- throw new Error(
- 'Failed to get registry parameter: ' +
- (error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error))
- );
+ throw new Error(
+ `Failed to get registry parameter: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`
+ );🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 46-47: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
string concatination is fine
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@hardingjam Understood! String concatenation is absolutely fine and works well for these error messages. I'll note this preference for future reviews.
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: hardingjam
PR: rainlanguage/rain.orderbook#1705
File: packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/RegistryManager.ts:46-48
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T15:37:59.917Z
Learning: String concatenation is an acceptable style choice for error messages in this codebase, rather than template literals.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/services/registry.test.ts(1 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/lib/services/registry.ts(0 hunks)packages/webapp/src/__tests__/handleGuiInitialization.test.ts(1 hunks)packages/webapp/src/lib/__mocks__/stores.ts(1 hunks)packages/webapp/src/routes/deploy/[strategyName]/[deploymentKey]/+page.svelte(0 hunks)packages/webapp/src/routes/deploy/page.test.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- packages/webapp/src/routes/deploy/[strategyName]/[deploymentKey]/+page.svelte
- packages/ui-components/src/lib/services/registry.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
packages/webapp/src/routes/deploy/page.test.ts (1)
packages/webapp/src/lib/__mocks__/stores.ts (1)
mockPageStore(60-70)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/services/registry.test.ts (1)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/services/registry.ts (3)
fetchParseRegistry(32-53)fetchRegistryDotrains(55-76)validateStrategies(78-118)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: git-clean
🔇 Additional comments (11)
packages/webapp/src/__tests__/handleGuiInitialization.test.ts (1)
6-13: Excellent mocking approach for better test isolation.This explicit mock implementation for
@rainlanguage/orderbookis a significant improvement over implicit mocking. By defining the mock at the file level, you've created better test isolation and made the test dependencies much clearer. This approach is more maintainable as it precisely controls what's being mocked and prevents unexpected behaviors from affecting your tests.packages/webapp/src/lib/__mocks__/stores.ts (2)
63-68: Good improvement to the mock store implementation.The updated
mockSetSubscribeValuenow uses theupdatemethod to merge partial state changes rather than replacing the entire state object. This makes tests more maintainable and concise since they only need to specify the parts of the state that are relevant to the test case.
69-69: Nice addition of a reset method.The
resetmethod provides a clean way to restore the store to its initial state between tests, which helps ensure test isolation and prevents test contamination.packages/webapp/src/routes/deploy/page.test.ts (3)
1-188: Well-structured and comprehensive test suite.This new test suite thoroughly tests the Page component under various scenarios, including error conditions, empty strategy lists, and valid/invalid strategy combinations. The mock setup is clean, properly isolating the component from its dependencies.
A few observations:
- Good use of
waitForto handle asynchronous component rendering- Proper test isolation with
beforeEachandvi.resetAllMocks()- Clear test data setup with mock strategies
- Comprehensive coverage of different UI states
The test structure follows best practices by testing both happy paths and error scenarios.
76-93: Proper error handling test.Good test for verifying error display when fetching strategies fails. The test effectively:
- Sets up the error state
- Renders the component with the necessary context
- Verifies the error message is displayed with the correct content
57-73: Good mock setup for useRegistry.The test properly mocks the
useRegistryhook with a readable store that provides the necessary methods. Setting up the mock in the beforeEach block ensures consistent test conditions.packages/ui-components/src/lib/services/registry.test.ts (5)
1-12: Well-structured test setup with proper mocking.The test setup correctly mocks the
DotrainOrderGuidependency and imports the functions to be tested. The use ofvi.mockfor external dependencies follows testing best practices.
13-47: Thorough testing of fetchParseRegistry function.The tests cover the happy path (successful parsing), error handling for failed HTTP responses, and network errors. Each test verifies the expected behavior with clear assertions.
49-112: Comprehensive tests for fetchRegistryDotrains.These tests effectively cover the fetching and parsing of dotrains from a registry URL, including error handling scenarios. The mock setup for multiple sequential fetch calls is particularly well done.
114-209: Robust validateStrategies tests with good edge case coverage.The tests thoroughly validate the strategy validation function, including:
- Proper categorization of valid and invalid strategies
- Exception handling during validation
- Non-Error exception handling
- Empty array handling
- Mixed validation results
This comprehensive approach ensures the function behaves correctly in all scenarios.
127-148: Good validation of interaction with dependencies.The test not only verifies the output of the function but also checks that the underlying
DotrainOrderGui.getStrategyDetailsmethod was called correctly with the expected parameters and the right number of times. This helps ensure the function interacts correctly with its dependencies.
| // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any | ||
| } as any |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider using a type-safe approach for mocked data.
Instead of using as any type assertions, consider creating a properly typed mock object that matches the expected data structure. This would provide better type safety and make tests more resilient to API changes.
- // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
- } as any
+ } as {
+ error: string;
+ validStrategies?: ValidStrategyDetail[];
+ invalidStrategies?: InvalidStrategyDetail[];
+ }Also applies to: 99-100
There was a problem hiding this comment.
explicit any is fine here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@hardingjam Understood, I'll respect your preference for using explicit any in test files. Thanks for clarifying.
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: hardingjam
PR: rainlanguage/rain.orderbook#1705
File: packages/webapp/src/routes/deploy/page.test.ts:80-81
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T15:38:30.541Z
Learning: For this codebase, explicit `any` type assertions are considered acceptable in test files, as confirmed by the repository owner.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/InputRegistryUrl.test.ts (1)
15-17: Mock path needs correctionThe mock path is incorrect. It's pointing to
'../lib/providers/registry/useRegistry'but should be relative to the current file using the same alias format as the other import on line 5 ($lib/services/loadRegistryUrl).-vi.mock('../lib/providers/registry/useRegistry', () => ({ +vi.mock('$lib/providers/registry/useRegistry', () => ({ useRegistry: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(mockRegistryStore) }));
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/InputRegistryUrl.test.ts(2 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/registry.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/InputRegistryUrl.test.ts (2)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/__mocks__/stores.ts (2)
mockRegistryStore(166-170)initialRegistry(13-23)packages/ui-components/src/lib/services/loadRegistryUrl.ts (1)
loadRegistryUrl(4-24)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: build-tauri (ubuntu-22.04, true)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/InputRegistryUrl.test.ts (4)
7-9: LGTM! Using hoisted imports for mocksGreat use of
vi.hoisted()to import mock stores early in the module evaluation, making them available for other mocks that depend on them.
35-47: Test correctly validates integration with registry serviceThe test properly verifies that the component calls
loadRegistryUrlwith the correct parameters when the button is clicked, which aligns with the new registry management system.
49-56: Test properly verifies initial state from registryGood test to ensure the input field is initialized with the current registry URL from the registry manager.
58-67: Error handling test is properly implementedThe test correctly verifies that error messages from failed registry URL loads are displayed to the user.
packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/registry.test.ts (5)
1-16: Good test setup with properly mocked dependenciesThe test file correctly sets up mocks for external dependencies, including the
DotrainOrderGuifrom@rainlanguage/orderbookand globalfetch.
17-51: Comprehensive tests for fetchParseRegistryTests cover all key scenarios:
- Success case with proper parsing of registry content
- Handling of failed fetch responses
- Handling of network errors
Good job on testing both the happy path and error handling cases.
53-116: Thorough testing of fetchRegistryDotrains with proper error casesTests cover:
- Successful fetching and parsing of multiple dotrains
- Failed dotrain fetches with appropriate error messages
- Network errors during dotrain fetching
The mock implementation of
fetchwith chained responses for different requests is well done.
118-212: Comprehensive validation strategy testsTests verify:
- Correct categorization of valid and invalid strategies
- Proper handling of exceptions during validation
- Processing of empty arrays
- Extraction of strategy details and error messages
Good use of the Mock type from Vitest and proper setup of the mock responses.
214-253: Well-designed test for mixed validation resultsThis test properly handles a realistic scenario with a mix of valid strategies, invalid strategies, and errors, ensuring that the validation function can process complex inputs correctly. Having this comprehensive test increases confidence in the validation logic.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/InputRegistryUrl.test.ts (1)
57-58: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Use consistent event triggering methods
This test uses
fireEvent.click()while the test on line 97 usesuser.click(). UserEvent is generally preferred as it more closely simulates real user interactions.-await fireEvent.click(button); +const user = userEvent.setup(); +await user.click(button);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/InputRegistryUrl.test.ts(2 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/loadRegistryUrl.test.ts(1 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/lib/__mocks__/stores.ts(3 hunks)packages/webapp/src/routes/deploy/+layout.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (3)
packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/loadRegistryUrl.test.ts (1)
packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/InputRegistryUrl.test.ts (1)
initialRegistry(12-22)
packages/webapp/src/routes/deploy/+layout.ts (3)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/services/registry.ts (3)
RegistryDotrain(9-12)fetchRegistryDotrains(55-76)validateStrategies(78-118)packages/ui-components/src/lib/index.ts (2)
ValidStrategyDetail(87-87)InvalidStrategyDetail(87-87)packages/webapp/src/lib/constants.ts (1)
REGISTRY_URL(1-2)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/__mocks__/stores.ts (2)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/RegistryManager.ts (1)
RegistryManager(4-147)packages/ui-components/src/lib/index.ts (1)
RegistryManager(136-136)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/InputRegistryUrl.test.ts
[error] 11-22: Do not export from a test file.
(lint/suspicious/noExportsInTest)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: git-clean
🔇 Additional comments (10)
packages/webapp/src/routes/deploy/+layout.ts (3)
7-17: Well-implemented type definition with JSDocThe addition of a proper JSDoc comment and explicit
LoadResulttype improves code readability and type safety. This change makes the structure of the load function's return value clear and self-documenting.
19-20: Good variable rename for clarityRenaming
registrytoregistryFromUrlbetter communicates the variable's purpose and source, making the code more maintainable and reducing confusion with other registry-related variables in the system.Also applies to: 28-28
3-5: Clean import organizationThe reorganization of imports improves readability by clearly separating type imports from value imports.
packages/ui-components/src/lib/__mocks__/stores.ts (1)
7-7: Good addition of registry mock storeThe addition of the
mockRegistryStorefollows the established pattern in the file and provides the necessary methods for testing components that interact with the registry system. This is essential for the new registry management architecture.Also applies to: 42-42, 150-154
packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/loadRegistryUrl.test.ts (4)
1-13: Well-structured test initializationThe test setup with proper mocking of dependencies and beforeEach reset is well implemented. Mocking
fetchRegistryDotrainsisolates the tests from external dependencies.
24-33: Good validation error testsThe tests properly verify that the function throws appropriate errors when inputs are missing or invalid, which is essential for robust error handling.
35-44: Comprehensive happy path testingThis test effectively verifies all expected behaviors of a successful registry URL load, including fetching the dotrains, updating the registry, and reloading the page.
46-75: Thorough error handling testsThese tests properly verify both Error object and non-Error rejection scenarios, ensuring that errors are propagated correctly and no unwanted side effects occur. The verification that
setRegistryand page reload aren't called during errors is particularly important.packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/InputRegistryUrl.test.ts (2)
8-37: Good mock implementation with hoisted importsUsing
vi.hoistedfor importing the mock store and implementing a clean mock of the registry manager makes the tests more maintainable. The mocking approach is more modular and focused than global mocks.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 11-22: Do not export from a test file.
(lint/suspicious/noExportsInTest)
49-61: Well-implemented test cases for component behaviorThe tests thoroughly cover the component's functionality, including interaction with the loadRegistryUrl service, error handling, and loading states. The use of fake timers for testing async behavior is particularly well done.
Also applies to: 72-81, 83-108
| /** | ||
| * Type for the registry store | ||
| */ | ||
| export type Registry = Readable<RegistryManager>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why does this need to be a store?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/loadRegistryUrl.test.ts (1)
47-76: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Standardize registry manager mocking
The tests use different approaches to mocking the registry manager. Line 38 uses the
initialRegistryfrom the imported file, while lines 50-52 and 64-66 create inline mocks.Consider standardizing on one approach, preferably using the
initialRegistrymock throughout for consistency.- const mockRegistryManager = { - setRegistry: vi.fn() - } as unknown as RegistryManager; + const mockRegistryManager = { ...initialRegistry, setRegistry: vi.fn() } as RegistryManager;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
packages/ui-components/src/__fixtures__/RegistryManager.ts(1 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/InputRegistryUrl.test.ts(2 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/loadRegistryUrl.test.ts(1 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/lib/components/deployment/DeploymentSteps.svelte(3 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/lib/components/input/InputRegistryUrl.svelte(1 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/lib/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/RegistryProvider.svelte(1 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/context.ts(1 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/useRegistry.ts(1 hunks)packages/webapp/src/lib/components/CustomRegistryWarning.svelte(2 hunks)packages/webapp/src/routes/deploy/+layout.svelte(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/InputRegistryUrl.test.ts (1)
Learnt from: hardingjam
PR: rainlanguage/rain.orderbook#1705
File: packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/InputRegistryUrl.test.ts:70-95
Timestamp: 2025-04-29T11:10:15.504Z
Learning: When testing time-dependent states like loading indicators in UI components, `userEvent.click()` is preferred over `fireEvent.click()` as it provides a more realistic simulation of user behavior, especially when used with fake timers.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/useRegistry.ts (3)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/index.ts (2)
useRegistry(139-139)RegistryManager(142-142)packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/context.ts (1)
getRegistryContext(8-16)packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/RegistryManager.ts (1)
RegistryManager(4-147)
packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/loadRegistryUrl.test.ts (1)
packages/ui-components/src/__fixtures__/RegistryManager.ts (1)
initialRegistry(7-17)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (16)
- GitHub Check: Deploy-Preview
- GitHub Check: build-tauri (ubuntu-22.04, true)
- GitHub Check: git-clean
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-rs-static)
- GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-artifacts)
- GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, test-js-bindings)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-legal)
- GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-wasm-artifacts)
- GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-wasm-test)
- GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, ob-rs-test, true)
- GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-static)
- GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-test)
- GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-rs-artifacts, true)
- GitHub Check: test
🔇 Additional comments (23)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/RegistryProvider.svelte (1)
1-10: Clean implementation of the registry provider pattern.The RegistryProvider component follows Svelte best practices by correctly setting up the context and providing a slot for child components. The component has a clear, single responsibility of making the registry manager available to its descendants.
packages/ui-components/src/lib/components/deployment/DeploymentSteps.svelte (3)
30-30: Good integration with the new registry system.Import of the new useRegistry hook aligns with the centralized registry management approach.
61-61: Proper initialization of the registry context.The registry is correctly initialized using the useRegistry hook, following the same pattern as other context hooks in the component.
154-156: Correctly updated to use dynamic registry URL.The handleShareChoices function now properly uses the dynamic registry URL from the registry manager instead of a static property.
packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/useRegistry.ts (2)
1-12: Well-implemented registry hook with clear documentation.The useRegistry hook follows the standard pattern for Svelte context hooks. The JSDoc comments provide clear guidance on how to use the hook within components.
14-38: Comprehensive test coverage for the registry hook.The tests properly mock dependencies, reset mocks between tests, and verify both the function call pattern and return value. This ensures the hook works as expected.
packages/webapp/src/lib/components/CustomRegistryWarning.svelte (2)
1-4: Good integration with the registry system.The component correctly imports and initializes the registry using the useRegistry hook.
8-8: Added test ID for improved testability.The data-testid attribute makes it easier to select this component in tests, improving test reliability.
packages/ui-components/src/lib/index.ts (1)
134-143: Well structured registry management exportsThe additions properly export the new registry management system components, hook, and class, making them accessible to consumers of the UI components library. This follows the established pattern in the file, maintaining consistency with how other UI components are exported.
packages/ui-components/src/lib/components/input/InputRegistryUrl.svelte (3)
3-9: Good implementation of the new registry patternThe refactored component correctly uses the new registry management system instead of direct localStorage access. The implementation is clean and reactive, fetching the initial URL value from the registry manager.
11-23: Well-implemented async handling with proper error managementThe async
handleClickfunction correctly manages loading state, error handling, and interacts with the registry manager through theloadRegistryUrlservice. This approach is more maintainable and testable than the previous direct manipulation.
26-43: Improved UI with user feedbackThe updated UI now provides proper loading feedback and error messages, improving the user experience significantly.
packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/loadRegistryUrl.test.ts (2)
1-13: Good test setup with proper mockingThe test file appropriately sets up the testing environment by mocking the required dependencies and using Vitest's testing utilities.
14-45: Comprehensive test coverage for happy path and basic error scenariosThe tests thoroughly verify error handling for missing inputs and the success scenario with proper assertions against the mocked dependencies.
packages/ui-components/src/lib/providers/registry/context.ts (3)
1-7: Good Svelte context implementation patternThe file follows best practices for Svelte context management by exporting a clear context key and providing getter/setter utilities.
8-16: Well-implemented error handling for context retrievalThe
getRegistryContextfunction properly verifies the presence of the registry in context and throws a helpful error message when it's missing, guiding developers to use theRegistryProvider.
25-61: Comprehensive testing of context utilitiesThe tests thoroughly verify both the successful retrieval of the registry from context and the error handling when the registry is not found. Good use of Vitest's mocking capabilities.
packages/ui-components/src/__fixtures__/RegistryManager.ts (1)
1-17: Well-structured test fixture with clean mock implementations.This new fixture provides a good separation of test concerns by moving mock registry functionality out of test files, allowing for reuse across multiple test suites. The mock functions are straightforward and maintain internal state appropriately.
packages/webapp/src/routes/deploy/+layout.svelte (1)
31-41: Toggle implementation works well with the slide transition.The implementation of the advanced mode toggle with the
slidetransition provides a nice user experience. The conditional rendering ensures theInputRegistryUrlcomponent is only shown when relevant.packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/InputRegistryUrl.test.ts (4)
5-8: Clean import structure with proper separation of concerns.The imports are well-organized, pulling in the necessary components, utilities, and fixtures needed for testing. The use of the dedicated
initialRegistryfixture from the__fixtures__folder addresses the previous feedback about not exporting test utilities from test files.
10-16: Mocking approach is clean and focused.The mocking implementation for
loadRegistryUrlanduseRegistryis concise and properly isolated. This approach allows for better test control compared to directly mocking browser APIs like localStorage.
35-47: Test verifies core component behavior correctly.This test properly verifies that clicking the load button calls the
loadRegistryUrlfunction with the correct arguments. The use ofuserEventfor user interactions is a good practice.
69-94: Effective use of fake timers for testing loading states.This test effectively uses fake timers to test the loading state of the component. The use of
userEvent.click()for time-dependent states aligns with your preferred approach as noted in the retrieved learnings.
| <a | ||
| on:click={() => { | ||
| registry.resetToDefault(); | ||
| }} | ||
| href="/deploy" | ||
| data-sveltekit-reload | ||
| class="font-semibold underline hover:text-blue-800 dark:hover:text-blue-900" | ||
| > | ||
| Use default. | ||
| </a> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider adding a confirmation dialog before resetting to default registry.
The implementation correctly resets the registry to default and forces a page reload. However, this is a potentially disruptive action that might cause users to lose their custom registry configuration unexpectedly.
Consider adding a confirmation dialog before resetting to the default registry, especially if users might have important configurations in their custom registry:
<a
on:click={(e) => {
+ if (!confirm('Are you sure you want to reset to the default registry? This action cannot be undone.')) {
+ e.preventDefault();
+ return;
+ }
registry.resetToDefault();
}}
href="/deploy"
data-sveltekit-reload
class="font-semibold underline hover:text-blue-800 dark:hover:text-blue-900"
>
Use default.
</a>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <a | |
| on:click={() => { | |
| registry.resetToDefault(); | |
| }} | |
| href="/deploy" | |
| data-sveltekit-reload | |
| class="font-semibold underline hover:text-blue-800 dark:hover:text-blue-900" | |
| > | |
| Use default. | |
| </a> | |
| <a | |
| on:click={(e) => { | |
| if ( | |
| !confirm( | |
| 'Are you sure you want to reset to the default registry? This action cannot be undone.' | |
| ) | |
| ) { | |
| e.preventDefault(); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| registry.resetToDefault(); | |
| }} | |
| href="/deploy" | |
| data-sveltekit-reload | |
| class="font-semibold underline hover:text-blue-800 dark:hover:text-blue-900" | |
| > | |
| Use default. | |
| </a> |
| <RegistryProvider {registryManager}> | ||
| {#if registryManager} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Redundant conditional check for registryManager.
Since registryManager is instantiated directly in the component and will always exist, the conditional check {#if registryManager} is unnecessary and could be removed.
<RegistryProvider {registryManager}>
- {#if registryManager}
<PageHeader title={$page.data.pageName || 'Deploy'} pathname={$page.url.pathname} />
<!-- rest of the content -->
- {/if}
</RegistryProvider>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <RegistryProvider {registryManager}> | |
| {#if registryManager} | |
| <RegistryProvider {registryManager}> | |
| <PageHeader title={$page.data.pageName || 'Deploy'} pathname={$page.url.pathname} /> | |
| <!-- rest of the content --> | |
| </RegistryProvider> |
| const registryManager = new RegistryManager(REGISTRY_URL); | ||
| $: advancedMode = registryManager.isCustomRegistry(); | ||
| $: isDeployPage = $page.url.pathname === '/deploy'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Registry integration looks good, but consider simplifying reactive dependencies.
The RegistryManager instantiation and reactive statement for advancedMode look good. However, since advancedMode directly mirrors the result of isCustomRegistry(), you could potentially use it in the template instead of calling the method directly in line 25.
- {#if registryManager.isCustomRegistry()}
+ {#if advancedMode}
Motivation
Solution
Checks
By submitting this for review, I'm confirming I've done the following:
Summary by CodeRabbit