Skip to content

Test TransactionStatusNotice.svelte #1714

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hardingjam
Copy link
Contributor

@hardingjam hardingjam commented Apr 29, 2025

Motivation

Solution

Checks

By submitting this for review, I'm confirming I've done the following:

  • made this PR as small as possible
  • unit-tested any new functionality
  • linked any relevant issues or PRs
  • included screenshots (if this involves a front-end change)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added comprehensive tests to verify the display and behavior of transaction status notifications for all status types.
  • Chores
    • Enhanced testability by adding data attributes to transaction status elements for easier identification in automated tests.

@hardingjam hardingjam added the test test code label Apr 29, 2025
@hardingjam hardingjam added this to the Test coverage, tech debt milestone Apr 29, 2025
@hardingjam hardingjam requested a review from hardyjosh April 29, 2025 15:13
@hardingjam hardingjam self-assigned this Apr 29, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 29, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes introduce data-testid attributes to various elements within the TransactionStatusNotice.svelte component to enhance testability. Additionally, a new test file is added, providing comprehensive tests for the component's rendering behavior across different transaction status types. The tests utilize Vitest and Testing Library, mock relevant dependencies, and verify the presence and content of UI elements based on transaction status. No modifications are made to the component's logic or exported interfaces.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
tauri-app/src/lib/components/TransactionStatusNotice.svelte Added data-testid attributes to key elements for improved test targeting; no logic or interface changes.
tauri-app/src/lib/components/TransactionStatusNotice.test.ts Added a new test suite using Vitest and Testing Library to verify component rendering for all status scenarios.

Suggested reviewers

  • hardyjosh

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9c4c519 and 67648c3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • tauri-app/src/lib/components/TransactionStatusNotice.svelte (2 hunks)
  • tauri-app/src/lib/components/TransactionStatusNotice.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
tauri-app/src/lib/components/TransactionStatusNotice.test.ts (1)
tauri-app/src/lib/stores/settings.ts (1)
  • activeChainHasBlockExplorer (60-62)
🔇 Additional comments (20)
tauri-app/src/lib/components/TransactionStatusNotice.svelte (9)

16-16: Well-structured test ID for the notice label.

This is a good addition for test selection of the component's main label element.


21-21: Good test ID placement for the pending prepare spinner.

This makes the spinner element selectable for tests verifying the pending prepare state.


25-28: Appropriate test ID for the pending sign status container.

The test ID is placed on the container div, making all the status-related content accessible within this element for testing.


30-30: Good test ID for the pending send spinner.

This allows tests to verify that the spinner is present during the sending state.


36-36: Well-placed test ID on the confirmed status icon.

This facilitates testing for the confirmed state's check icon.


39-41: Good test ID placement for the confirmed transaction hash container.

This allows tests to verify both the presence and content of the transaction hash.


44-44: Appropriate test ID for the block explorer link.

This enables testing the presence and attributes of the block explorer link.


55-55: Good test ID for the failed status icon.

This allows tests to verify the error state is properly indicated.


58-58: Well-placed test ID on the failed payload container.

This enables testing of error message rendering for failed transactions.

tauri-app/src/lib/components/TransactionStatusNotice.test.ts (11)

1-8: Good setup of testing dependencies and imports.

The test file imports the necessary testing utilities from Testing Library, Vitest, and Svelte stores. It also properly imports the component under test and its related dependencies.


10-16: Well-structured mocks for external dependencies.

The mocks for the store and utility function are clearly defined. Using writable(true) for the activeChainHasBlockExplorer store allows dynamic control of its value during tests.


18-27: Good helper function for generating test data.

The createNotice function provides a consistent way to generate test data with different statuses and payloads, reducing repetition in the test cases.


29-33: Proper test setup with beforeEach.

The beforeEach hook ensures a clean test environment by clearing mocks and setting the default store value before each test, preventing test pollution.


35-39: Good basic test for label rendering.

This first test verifies the fundamental rendering of the component's label, establishing a baseline for component functionality.


41-51: Effective use of test.each for similar status types.

Using test.each for the Initialized and PendingPrepare statuses is efficient and reduces code duplication, as both statuses render the same UI elements.


53-61: Good test coverage for PendingSign status.

The test verifies both the presence of the status container and the expected content within it, using within() to scope the element queries appropriately.


63-71: Comprehensive test for PendingSend status.

The test checks for the spinner, main status text, and the informational text about sending and awaiting confirmations.


73-93: Thorough test for Confirmed status with block explorer.

This test effectively verifies multiple aspects:

  1. Proper icon rendering
  2. Status text display
  3. Transaction hash display
  4. Block explorer link presence and attributes
  5. Proper URL formatting using the mock function

The test also checks that the URL formatting function is called with the correct transaction hash.


95-109: Good negative test for Confirmed status without block explorer.

This test ensures the block explorer link is not rendered when the activeChainHasBlockExplorer store is false, and verifies that the URL formatting function is not called.


111-120: Complete test coverage for Failed status.

The test verifies the error icon, status text, and that the error message is correctly displayed within the failed payload container.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@hardingjam hardingjam marked this pull request as ready for review April 29, 2025 15:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
test test code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant