Skip to content

Test pageHeader #1716

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Test pageHeader #1716

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

hardingjam
Copy link
Contributor

@hardingjam hardingjam commented Apr 30, 2025

Motivation

Solution

Checks

By submitting this for review, I'm confirming I've done the following:

  • made this PR as small as possible
  • unit-tested any new functionality
  • linked any relevant issues or PRs
  • included screenshots (if this involves a front-end change)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added tests to verify that the page header displays the correct title and breadcrumb navigation links.

@hardingjam hardingjam self-assigned this Apr 30, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 30, 2025

Walkthrough

A new test suite for the PageHeader.svelte component has been added. The tests utilize Vitest and Svelte Testing Library, with the generateBreadcrumbs utility function being mocked to provide controlled breadcrumb data. The suite verifies that the component renders the page title, calls the breadcrumb generation function with the correct pathname, and displays breadcrumb navigation links with proper roles, names, and URLs. No changes were made to any exported or public entities in the codebase.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
packages/ui-components/src/tests/PageHeader.test.ts Added a test suite for PageHeader.svelte that mocks generateBreadcrumbs and verifies rendering and logic.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant TestSuite
    participant PageHeader
    participant generateBreadcrumbs

    TestSuite->>PageHeader: Render with props (title, pathname)
    PageHeader->>generateBreadcrumbs: Call with pathname
    generateBreadcrumbs-->>PageHeader: Return mocked breadcrumb data
    PageHeader-->>TestSuite: Render title and breadcrumbs in DOM
    TestSuite->>PageHeader: Assert title and breadcrumb links are correct
Loading
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@hardingjam hardingjam added the test test code label Apr 30, 2025
@hardingjam hardingjam added this to the Test coverage, tech debt milestone Apr 30, 2025
@hardingjam hardingjam marked this pull request as ready for review April 30, 2025 10:42
@hardingjam hardingjam requested a review from hardyjosh April 30, 2025 10:43
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9c4c519 and 0c32799.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/PageHeader.test.ts (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (16)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, test-js-bindings)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-legal)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-rs-static)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-wasm-test)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-rs-artifacts, true)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-wasm-artifacts)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-artifacts)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-static)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-test)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, ob-rs-test, true)
  • GitHub Check: git-clean
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build-tauri (ubuntu-22.04, true)
  • GitHub Check: Deploy-Preview
  • GitHub Check: test
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/PageHeader.test.ts (5)

1-4: Well-structured imports for testing environment.

The imports correctly set up the testing environment with Svelte Testing Library and Vitest. Good job importing only what's needed.


5-9: Good mock implementation for breadcrumbs utility.

The mock implementation properly isolates the component being tested from its dependencies. The approach of mocking the module and then importing the mocked function is clean and effective.


11-22: Well-organized test setup with clear mock data.

The test suite is well-structured with descriptive mock data that makes the tests easy to understand. The beforeEach hook properly resets mocks between tests, which is essential for test isolation.


24-28: Clear title rendering verification.

This test effectively verifies that the component renders the title correctly. The use of a data-testid attribute makes the test resilient to UI changes.


30-35: Good verification of integration with breadcrumb generation.

The test properly verifies that the component calls the breadcrumb utility with the correct parameters, validating the integration between components.

Comment on lines +11 to +50
describe('PageHeader.svelte', () => {
const mockTitle = 'Test Page';
const mockPathname = '/test/path';
const mockCrumbs = [
{ label: 'Test', href: '/test' },
{ label: 'Path', href: '/test/path' }
];

beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks();
vi.mocked(generateBreadcrumbs).mockReturnValue(mockCrumbs);
});

it('renders the title correctly', () => {
render(PageHeader, { props: { title: mockTitle, pathname: mockPathname } });

expect(screen.getByTestId('breadcrumb-page-title')).toHaveTextContent(mockTitle);
});

it('calls generateBreadcrumbs with the correct pathname', () => {
render(PageHeader, { props: { title: mockTitle, pathname: mockPathname } });

expect(generateBreadcrumbs).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(generateBreadcrumbs).toHaveBeenCalledWith(mockPathname);
});

it('renders the generated breadcrumbs', () => {
render(PageHeader, { props: { title: mockTitle, pathname: mockPathname } });

const nav = screen.getByRole('navigation', { name: 'Default breadcrumb example' });

const links = within(nav).getAllByRole('link');

expect(links[0]).toHaveAttribute('href', '/');

mockCrumbs.forEach((crumb) => {
expect(screen.getByRole('link', { name: crumb.label })).toHaveAttribute('href', crumb.href);
});
});
});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Consider adding tests for edge cases.

The current tests cover the happy path but don't test any edge cases or error handling.

Consider adding tests for scenarios like:

  • Empty breadcrumbs array
  • Very long breadcrumb paths
  • Special characters in breadcrumb labels

Example:

it('handles empty breadcrumbs gracefully', () => {
  vi.mocked(generateBreadcrumbs).mockReturnValue([]);
  render(PageHeader, { props: { title: mockTitle, pathname: mockPathname } });
  
  const nav = screen.getByRole('navigation', { name: 'Default breadcrumb example' });
  const links = within(nav).getAllByRole('link');
  
  // Should only have the root link
  expect(links.length).toBe(1);
  expect(links[0]).toHaveAttribute('href', '/');
});

Comment on lines +37 to +49
it('renders the generated breadcrumbs', () => {
render(PageHeader, { props: { title: mockTitle, pathname: mockPathname } });

const nav = screen.getByRole('navigation', { name: 'Default breadcrumb example' });

const links = within(nav).getAllByRole('link');

expect(links[0]).toHaveAttribute('href', '/');

mockCrumbs.forEach((crumb) => {
expect(screen.getByRole('link', { name: crumb.label })).toHaveAttribute('href', crumb.href);
});
});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Consider enhancing breadcrumb verification.

While the test covers basic breadcrumb rendering, it could be more robust by explicitly verifying the order and total number of links.

Consider enhancing the test to verify the exact number and order of links:

  const links = within(nav).getAllByRole('link');

+ // Verify we have the expected number of links (root + all breadcrumbs)
+ expect(links.length).toBe(1 + mockCrumbs.length);
+ 
  expect(links[0]).toHaveAttribute('href', '/');

- mockCrumbs.forEach((crumb) => {
-   expect(screen.getByRole('link', { name: crumb.label })).toHaveAttribute('href', crumb.href);
- });
+ // Verify each breadcrumb link in order
+ mockCrumbs.forEach((crumb, index) => {
+   expect(links[index + 1]).toHaveTextContent(crumb.label);
+   expect(links[index + 1]).toHaveAttribute('href', crumb.href);
+ });
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
it('renders the generated breadcrumbs', () => {
render(PageHeader, { props: { title: mockTitle, pathname: mockPathname } });
const nav = screen.getByRole('navigation', { name: 'Default breadcrumb example' });
const links = within(nav).getAllByRole('link');
expect(links[0]).toHaveAttribute('href', '/');
mockCrumbs.forEach((crumb) => {
expect(screen.getByRole('link', { name: crumb.label })).toHaveAttribute('href', crumb.href);
});
});
it('renders the generated breadcrumbs', () => {
render(PageHeader, { props: { title: mockTitle, pathname: mockPathname } });
const nav = screen.getByRole('navigation', { name: 'Default breadcrumb example' });
const links = within(nav).getAllByRole('link');
// Verify we have the expected number of links (root + all breadcrumbs)
expect(links.length).toBe(1 + mockCrumbs.length);
expect(links[0]).toHaveAttribute('href', '/');
// Verify each breadcrumb link in order
mockCrumbs.forEach((crumb, index) => {
expect(links[index + 1]).toHaveTextContent(crumb.label);
expect(links[index + 1]).toHaveAttribute('href', crumb.href);
});
});

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
test test code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant