Skip to content

Test license #1720

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Test license #1720

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

hardingjam
Copy link
Contributor

@hardingjam hardingjam commented May 1, 2025

Motivation

Solution

Checks

By submitting this for review, I'm confirming I've done the following:

  • made this PR as small as possible
  • unit-tested any new functionality
  • linked any relevant issues or PRs
  • included screenshots (if this involves a front-end change)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in the license display by showing a clear "Failed to fetch license" message if the license content cannot be retrieved.
  • Tests

    • Added unit tests to verify license fetching behavior and error handling in the license component.

@hardingjam hardingjam added the test test code label May 1, 2025
@hardingjam hardingjam added this to the Test coverage, tech debt milestone May 1, 2025
@hardingjam hardingjam self-assigned this May 1, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 1, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new test file for the License Svelte component, adding unit tests that mock network requests and component dependencies to verify component behavior under both successful and failed fetch scenarios. Additionally, the License.svelte component's error handling is updated so that, upon a failed fetch operation, it now sets the markdown source to a specific error message ("Failed to fetch license") instead of an empty string.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/License.test.ts Added new unit tests for the License component, with mocks for fetch and the markdown component.
packages/ui-components/src/lib/components/License.svelte Modified error handling to set source to 'Failed to fetch license' on fetch failure.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant LicenseComponent
    participant GitHub

    User->>LicenseComponent: Mounts component
    activate LicenseComponent
    LicenseComponent->>GitHub: Fetch license markdown
    alt Fetch succeeds
        GitHub-->>LicenseComponent: Returns markdown content
        LicenseComponent->>LicenseComponent: Set source to markdown content
    else Fetch fails
        GitHub-->>LicenseComponent: Network error/exception
        LicenseComponent->>LicenseComponent: Set source to "Failed to fetch license"
    end
    deactivate LicenseComponent
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2beb8d9 and 20bf703.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/License.test.ts (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (16)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-legal)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-wasm-artifacts)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-wasm-test)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-artifacts)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-static)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, test-js-bindings)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-rs-static)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-rs-artifacts, true)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-test)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, ob-rs-test, true)
  • GitHub Check: build-tauri (ubuntu-22.04, true)
  • GitHub Check: git-clean
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: Deploy-Preview
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: test
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/License.test.ts (2)

1-43: Test implementation looks good.

The test setup, mocking, and assertions are well-structured. The test properly verifies that the License component fetches content from the expected URL and passes it to the markdown component when successful.


19-25: Good test hygiene with proper setup and teardown.

Using beforeEach to reset mocks and afterEach to restore all mocks ensures clean test isolation.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@hardingjam hardingjam marked this pull request as ready for review May 1, 2025 10:38
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
packages/ui-components/src/lib/components/License.svelte (1)

1-29: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Consider adding a loading state

The component currently doesn't show any loading state while the fetch is in progress. Users will see nothing until the fetch completes.

Consider adding a loading state:

<script>
    import { Heading, Text, BlockQuote } from '@rainlanguage/ui-components';
    import Markdown from 'svelte-markdown';
    import { onMount } from 'svelte';

    let source = '';
+   let isLoading = true;

    onMount(async () => {
        try {
            const response = await fetch(
                'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rainlanguage/decentralicense/refs/heads/master/README.md'
            );
            if (response.ok) {
                source = await response.text();
            }
        } catch {
            source = 'Failed to fetch license';
+       } finally {
+           isLoading = false;
        }
    });
</script>

+{#if isLoading}
+   <Text>Loading license...</Text>
+{:else}
<Markdown
    {source}
    renderers={{
        text: Text,
        heading: Heading,
        blockquote: BlockQuote
    }}
/>
+{/if}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9c4c519 and 40a5df4.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/License.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/ui-components/src/lib/components/License.svelte (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (16)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build-tauri (ubuntu-22.04, true)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-legal)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-static)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-wasm-artifacts)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-artifacts)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-wasm-test)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, test-js-bindings)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-rs-artifacts, true)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-rs-static)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-test)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, ob-rs-test, true)
  • GitHub Check: Deploy-Preview
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: git-clean
  • GitHub Check: test
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/ui-components/src/__tests__/License.test.ts (1)

1-60: Well-structured tests with good coverage

The test file is well-structured and covers both the success and error paths of the component. Good job implementing comprehensive tests for this component.

Comment on lines 16 to 18
} catch {
source = '';
source = 'Failed to fetch license';
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Improved error handling, but consider additional edge cases

The change to display a clear error message when fetch fails is a good improvement over the previous empty string. This makes the failure more visible and understandable to users.

However, there's still no handling for non-ok HTTP responses (like 404 or 500). Consider improving the error handling further:

try {
    const response = await fetch(
        'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rainlanguage/decentralicense/refs/heads/master/README.md'
    );
    if (response.ok) {
        source = await response.text();
+   } else {
+       source = `Failed to fetch license: HTTP ${response.status}`;
    }
} catch {
    source = 'Failed to fetch license';
}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
} catch {
source = '';
source = 'Failed to fetch license';
}
try {
const response = await fetch(
'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rainlanguage/decentralicense/refs/heads/master/README.md'
);
if (response.ok) {
source = await response.text();
} else {
source = `Failed to fetch license: HTTP ${response.status}`;
}
} catch {
source = 'Failed to fetch license';
}

Comment on lines 45 to 58
it('handles fetch network error gracefully', async () => {
mockFetch.mockRejectedValue(new Error('Network error'));

const { container } = render(License);

await waitFor(() => {
expect(mockFetch).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockFetch).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expectedUrl);
});

await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByTestId('mock-component').getAttribute('source')).toBe('Failed to fetch license');
});
});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Consider adding a test for non-OK responses

The current tests cover successful fetch and network errors, but there's no test for HTTP error responses (when fetch succeeds but returns a non-OK status like 404 or 500).

Consider adding a test case for this scenario:

it('handles non-OK HTTP responses gracefully', async () => {
  mockFetch.mockResolvedValue({
    ok: false,
    status: 404,
    statusText: 'Not Found'
  });

  render(License);

  await waitFor(() => {
    expect(mockFetch).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
    expect(mockFetch).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expectedUrl);
  });

  // This will currently fail as the component doesn't handle non-OK responses
  // but is a good test to add if you implement the suggested handling
  await waitFor(() => {
    expect(screen.getByTestId('mock-component').getAttribute('source')).toBe('');
    // or with suggested change: toBe('Failed to fetch license: HTTP 404');
  });
});

Comment on lines +16 to +17
const expectedUrl =
'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rainlanguage/decentralicense/refs/heads/master/README.md';
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Consider extracting the URL as a constant

The hardcoded URL in the component is duplicated in the test, creating a tight coupling between the test and implementation details.

If the URL changes in the component, you'll need to update it in two places. Consider extracting it to a constant or configuration value that can be shared:

// Could be moved to a separate constants file that both component and test import
export const LICENSE_URL = 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rainlanguage/decentralicense/refs/heads/master/README.md';

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
test test code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant