-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Accommodate 'prime-alpha' and 'prime-rc' in regex #412
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Above PR CI: only 3 tests failed, which are hiccup. |
|
CI for 2.12.4-alpha4 is passing: https://github.com/rancher/fleet-e2e/actions/runs/19360943874 (Failures are similar to 2.12-head CI run.) |
438191a to
c6b794b
Compare
| github.com/pmezard/go-difflib v1.0.0 h1:4DBwDE0NGyQoBHbLQYPwSUPoCMWR5BEzIk/f1lZbAQM= | ||
| github.com/pmezard/go-difflib v1.0.0/go.mod h1:iKH77koFhYxTK1pcRnkKkqfTogsbg7gZNVY4sRDYZ/4= | ||
| github.com/prometheus/client_model v0.0.0-20190812154241-14fe0d1b01d4/go.mod h1:xMI15A0UPsDsEKsMN9yxemIoYk6Tm2C1GtYGdfGttqA= | ||
| github.com/rancher-sandbox/ele-testhelpers v0.0.0-20251113092326-9b43cc34d982 h1:pQ0S4n8+impomKiOYBXuOGKGC6/8TV0rbFNLOhGtUFY= |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sorry. what is the consecuence of this removal?
Shouldn't be done in other pr?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No side effect of it, as it is just removal.
If it was addition then separate PR is required.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, but a removal can be also problematic.
What is that removal and why is necessary?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok. the description has been updated to remove duplicated entry of go.sum.
Being a duplicated can be a reason to remove code, but not the removal itself, which can be dangerous.
The removal comes per my understanding from another pr trying to fix 2.12 lanes.
So that is the explanation I was looking.
Thanks approving.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This removal is not problematic as this is extra entry for ele-testhelpes modules.
But the entry from go.mod will be used, hence removing this unnecessary entry from go.sum.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.