Skip to content

Conversation

@aacevedoosorio
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@aacevedoosorio aacevedoosorio requested a review from a team as a code owner November 27, 2025 14:16
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 27, 2025

Deploy Preview for suse-obs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 725b529
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/suse-obs/deploys/692865aab261730008a37f7d
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-140--suse-obs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@aacevedoosorio aacevedoosorio changed the base branch from main to staging November 27, 2025 14:16
start_page: en:classic.adoc
asciidoc:
attributes:
stackpacks2_enabled: false
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is there now a deploy where this is enabled? should we get that going?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, there's no deployment with that enabled. @akashraj4261 explained to us that we could flip it for the review so we can see it in the 😎 Deploy Preview

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i would be great if DeployPreview would enable the flag but our production deploy does not, lets ask him during standup

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see netlify uses the ss-local-playbook to render the netlify deploy. (https://app.netlify.com/projects/suse-obs/deploys/69285d3149b414000837bf17)

Can we not add the attribute to true to that file and leave it out of the ss-remote-playbook (which i assume is used for production).

@akashraj4261 please advise

ifdef::stackpacks2_enabled[]
** xref:setup/otel/otelmappings/README.adoc[Open Telemetry Mappings]
*** xref:setup/otel/otelmappings/concepts.adoc[Concepts]
*** xref:setup/otel/otelmappings/troubleshooting.adoc[Troubleshooting]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i can still find this page through search, any chance we can feature flag all the pages? https://deploy-preview-140--suse-obs.netlify.app/suse-observability/latest/en/setup/otel/otelmappings/troubleshooting.html

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can feature flag the whole page with a similar ifdef block but we discussed that's it's an overkill. Same if you would like to guard the case where somebody knows/gets the url

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rb3ckers what is your thought here. are we ok having these pages show up in live docs during search and if the URLs are known?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems that feature flagging each page will help with the search ..

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I prefer not to have them in the search. But having the url be accessible is ok I think. If people are guessing URLs I wouldn't mind too much.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then I think the latest changes accomplish that .... not available in the search

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants