-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
Adding Neuvector pipeline scripts for allinone regression tests #387
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
slickwarren
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
some small nits
| stage('Execution') { | ||
| withCredentials([string(credentialsId: 'NEUVECTOR_PASSWORD', variable: 'NEUVECTOR_PASSWORD')]) { | ||
| sh ''' | ||
| sshpass -p "$NEUVECTOR_PASSWORD" ssh [email protected] "/mnt/nfs/share/QA/automation/allinone_script.sh $NV_RELEASE_TAG $_DIR_ $JOB_NAME $BUILD_NUMBER" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know these run behind the VPN but, I think it would be a good idea for best-practice to put these IPs in a jenkins secret instead
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is there a convention / reason these are just numbered names instead of something more descriptive we typically name based on what the test / job will be doing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have around 1000+ test cases that we execute on these so we split them across 7 servers to get the results in few hours. Hence we have the such naming convention i.e 1 to 7
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is there an indentation missing on these?
slickwarren
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm. Do you already have a jenkins-job-builder PR too?
|
@slickwarren Yes I have the jenkins-job-builder ready for the jobs. I just want to make the SCM changes for these jobs in staging and verify it once before creating the pull request. |
|
@slickwarren Should I request with someone for merging this PR ?. |
|
@venkateshjayagopal you should be good to go, but if there's someone else on your team it would be nice to have them review it too for best practice. |
selvamt94
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Adding Neuvector pipeline scripts for allinone regression tests