Skip to content

Conversation

@saimahesh8752
Copy link

Description

This PR adds a new community tutorial demonstrating how RAPIDS cuDF can accelerate large-scale rule-based filtering and boolean masking compared to a CPU-based Pandas implementation.

Use Case

Many data and AI workflows include a post-processing step where large volumes of model or agent outputs must be validated against deterministic rules (e.g., compliance checks, routing constraints, or risk thresholds). At scale, this rule-evaluation step can become a performance bottleneck on the CPU.

This notebook focuses on isolating and benchmarking that workload using cuDF on the GPU.

Benchmark Overview (demonstrated in notebook)

  • Dataset: 1,000,000 synthetic records
  • Comparison: Pandas (CPU) vs cuDF (GPU)
  • Measurement: Rule-evaluation time only (data transfer excluded)
  • Result: ~25–30× speedup for vectorized rule evaluation on NVIDIA T4

Content

  • omniguard_cudf_rule_evaluation_benchmark.ipynb
    Demonstrates CPU vs GPU rule evaluation using identical logic and data.

Checklist

  • Notebook runs end-to-end without errors on NVIDIA T4
  • CPU and GPU implementations apply identical rules
  • Benchmark scope and exclusions are clearly documented
  • All data is synthetically generated

Add GPU-accelerated benchmark notebook
@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant