-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 321
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update Betweenness Centrality normalization #4974
Merged
rapids-bot
merged 7 commits into
rapidsai:branch-25.04
from
ChuckHastings:fix_betweenness_normalization
Mar 20, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
03f142e
update BC normalization
ChuckHastings 56b53f4
update BC to improve normalizationm computation
ChuckHastings 4c9b203
after discussion, add back the halving of unnormalized results on und…
ChuckHastings 52c7962
Merge branch 'branch-25.04' into fix_betweenness_normalization
ChuckHastings 4592042
Update python/cugraph/cugraph/tests/centrality/test_betweenness_centr…
ChuckHastings 2df0021
Merge branch 'branch-25.04' into fix_betweenness_normalization
ChuckHastings e41ce24
handle case where we might get 0
ChuckHastings File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No need to subtract 1 from
num_sources
? (i.e.static_cast<vertex_t>(num_sources - 1)
?)I assume
num_sources == graph_view.number_of_vertices()
for full BC. It looks a bit weird to subtract 1 just fromgraph_view.number_of_vertices()
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We had some complex gyrations around the formulas.
There are a couple of things being accounted for in the scaling factor. In the normalization path, we're trying to divide by the maximum number of times a vertex could appear in the shortest paths. For the full graph, since we're not including endpoints, this is
(n-1) * (n-2)
where n is the number of vertices in the graph. This would occur for a vertexv
that has an input edge from every vertex in the graph. Then-1
factor counts every vertex other thanv
(when we start atv
we won't travel back tov
and we're not counting the endpoint). and then-2
factor is the maximum number of paths that could travel throughv
.For approximate betweenness, we're only traveling through
num_sources
samples. So the maximum value would benum_sources
*n-2
. This would occur in any combination of the above described graph where the randomly selected sources did not include the vertexv
.I agree it looks odd.