Skip to content

RDKEMW-3380 : Evaluate the Deepsleep Scenario for Static and Dynamic method #123

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 39 commits into from
May 12, 2025

Conversation

Abhinavpv28
Copy link
Contributor

Reason for change: Fix operational gaps in deepsleep scenario in rrd
Test Procedure: Focused Regression over remotedebugger
Risks: Medium
Signed-off-by: Abhinav P V [email protected]

@Abhinavpv28 Abhinavpv28 requested review from a team as code owners May 9, 2025 20:46
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@@ -268,7 +258,6 @@ void _pwrManagerEventHandler(const char *owner, IARM_EventId_t eventId, void *da
RDK_LOG(RDK_LOG_DEBUG, LOG_REMDEBUG, "[%s:%d]: ...Exit.. \n", __FUNCTION__, __LINE__);
}
Copy link

@rdkcmf-jenkins rdkcmf-jenkins May 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Coverity issue no longer present as of: undefined

Show issue

Coverity Issue - Resource leak

Variable "sbuf" going out of scope leaks the storage it points to.

High Impact, CWE-404
RESOURCE_LEAK

@nhanasi nhanasi merged commit e33aa12 into develop May 12, 2025
6 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants