Skip to content

RDKEMW-1768 -Fix UT in RRD with Static profile update and Null Check #95

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 21 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Abhinavpv28
Copy link
Contributor

@Abhinavpv28 Abhinavpv28 commented Mar 8, 2025

Reason for change:
Test Procedure: Basic Sanity, Ensure sanity check is working in static, Dynamic profiles
Risks: Low
Signed-off-by: Abhinav P V [email protected]

@Abhinavpv28 Abhinavpv28 requested review from a team as code owners March 8, 2025 06:18
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@rdkcmf-jenkins
Copy link

rdkcmf-jenkins commented Mar 11, 2025

Coverity Issue - Dereference after null check

Passing "rbuf" to "processIssueTypeEvent", which dereferences null "rbuf->mdata".

Medium Impact, CWE-476
FORWARD_NULL

Issue location

This issue was discovered outside the diff for this Pull Request. You can find it at:
src/rrdMain.c:66

Copy link
Contributor

@nhanasi nhanasi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

src/rrdMain.c changes may not be needed as par latest code

@Abhinavpv28 Abhinavpv28 changed the title Test-Do not merge RDKEMW-1768 -Fix UT in RRD with Static profile update and Null Check Mar 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants