(feat) Add masking to python middleware #955
Conversation
hoxworth
changed the title
|
@AndriiAndreiev when you have a chance, can you take over this PR from Kenny? I'm happy to chat through this live - but the general intention is to use hash any |
| "bodySize": -1, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if "Authorization" in headers: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
at this point, if there is an Authorization header, won't there already be an unmasked Authorization header in payload["headers"]?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That would be my expectation too - does .append overwrite the existing header here, or do we need to forcefully delete it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@AndriiAndreiev aside from confirming @llimllib 's comment, this looks good to me! Thank you for picking this up and bringing it to the finish line 😊
|
@gratcliff @llimllib I made small changes on "Authorization" header masking so that there is no copy of the original and masked header |
| 🚥 Resolves [RM-8742](https://linear.app/readme-io/issue/RM-8742) | | :------------------- | ## 🧰 Changes Adds sensitive data masking to the Dotnet SDK The logic is the same as we will have in Python SDK (PR #955)
| 🚥 Resolves [RM-8742](https://linear.app/readme-io/issue/RM-8742) | | :------------------- | ## 🧰 Changes Adds sensitive data masking to the PHP SDK The logic is the same as we will have in Python SDK (PR #955)
4 participants
🧰 Changes
Adds sensitive data masking to the Python SDK
🧬 QA & Testing
Updated and added tests as applicable