Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add extra CI checks #25

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Oct 18, 2024
Merged

feat: add extra CI checks #25

merged 19 commits into from
Oct 18, 2024

Conversation

JulissaDantes
Copy link
Contributor

@JulissaDantes JulissaDantes commented Oct 16, 2024

The CI checks need to be more robust and should incorporate checks for linting, coverage, and the safety of upgraded storage layouts.

@JulissaDantes JulissaDantes marked this pull request as ready for review October 17, 2024 14:04
@JulissaDantes JulissaDantes marked this pull request as draft October 17, 2024 14:05
@JulissaDantes JulissaDantes marked this pull request as ready for review October 17, 2024 18:20
Copy link
Member

@sanderpick sanderpick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm 💪 what do you think about fixing the warnings below in a diff PR?

storageLayouts: ".storage-layouts",
},
storageLayoutConfig: {
contracts: ['src/Hoku.sol:Hoku'],
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we add all contracts here? i'm not sure how this works

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When we merge the gater work we need to include it here, or if this gets merged first we need to include t in the gater branch

steps:
- name: Checkout Repository
uses: actions/checkout@v2

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: extra line

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed

@dtbuchholz
Copy link
Contributor

lgtm 💪 what do you think about fixing the warnings below in a diff PR?

since the errors are my doing, I don't mind just including them in the buckets work

@JulissaDantes JulissaDantes merged commit 80beb37 into main Oct 18, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants