-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add extra CI checks #25
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm 💪 what do you think about fixing the warnings below in a diff PR?
storageLayouts: ".storage-layouts", | ||
}, | ||
storageLayoutConfig: { | ||
contracts: ['src/Hoku.sol:Hoku'], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we add all contracts here? i'm not sure how this works
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When we merge the gater work we need to include it here, or if this gets merged first we need to include t in the gater branch
steps: | ||
- name: Checkout Repository | ||
uses: actions/checkout@v2 | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: extra line
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed
since the errors are my doing, I don't mind just including them in the buckets work |
The CI checks need to be more robust and should incorporate checks for linting, coverage, and the safety of upgraded storage layouts.