docs: label MAP@k notebook outputs consistently#2350
Open
he-yufeng wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Yufeng He <40085740+he-yufeng@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Follow-up for #2309 after #2316 moved the metric calculation to
map_at_k().A few notebooks still displayed the resulting
map_at_k()value as plainMAPorMean average precision, which makes the output look like the non-@kmetric even though the code is already computing MAP@k. This PR only updates those labels toMAP@K/MAP@kand fixes one broken markdown link in the same operationalization notebook paragraph.Related Issues
Fixes #2309.
References
Checklist:
git commit -s -m "your commit message".staging branchAND NOT TOmain branch.Validation:
git diff --check.