Skip to content

Skipping ibmcloud testcase for machine not found error: v4.17 #12069

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release-4.17
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vasudha786
Copy link
Member

Skipping ibmcloud testcase for machine not found error: v4.17

@vasudha786 vasudha786 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 6, 2025 06:09
@@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ class TestNodeReplacementTwice(ManageTest):
2. ceph side host still on the old rack
"""

@skipif_ibm_cloud_managed
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of skipping, why not fix it in ocs-ci?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My guess is that in IBM ROKS managed platform the node operations are very limited and this might be the case here that this is not possible to implement on IBM CLOUD Managed AKA ROKS platform. But @vasudha786 know better.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right. Since ours is not IPI platform we do not support this

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 7, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: petr-balogh, suchita-g, vasudha786

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants