Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 2260319: Fencing takes more time than expected #185

Conversation

ELENAGER
Copy link

@ELENAGER ELENAGER commented Feb 8, 2024

Signed-off-by: Elena Gershkovich [email protected]
(cherry picked from commit e544937)

Signed-off-by: Elena Gershkovich <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit e544937)
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 8, 2024

@ELENAGER: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2260319, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "ODF 4.14.5" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 2260319: Fencing takes more time than expected

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ELENAGER
Copy link
Author

/bugzilla refresh

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 22, 2024

@ELENAGER: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2260319, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "ODF 4.14.5" release, but it targets "ODF 4.14.6" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ELENAGER ELENAGER closed this Mar 7, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 7, 2024

@ELENAGER: An error was encountered removing this pull request from the external tracker bugs for bug 2260319 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. response code 400 not 200

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

Bug 2260319: Fencing takes more time than expected

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ELENAGER ELENAGER deleted the bug_2260319_long_fencing_4.14_backport branch March 7, 2024 13:15
@ELENAGER ELENAGER restored the bug_2260319_long_fencing_4.14_backport branch March 7, 2024 13:46
@ELENAGER
Copy link
Author

ELENAGER commented Mar 7, 2024

Reopening

@ELENAGER ELENAGER reopened this Mar 7, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 7, 2024

@ELENAGER: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2260319, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "ODF 4.14.6" release, but it targets "---" instead
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 2260319: Fencing takes more time than expected

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kseegerrh
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 12, 2024

@kseegerrh: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2260319, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "ODF 4.14.6" release, but it targets "---" instead
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ELENAGER
Copy link
Author

/bugzilla refresh

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 12, 2024

@ELENAGER: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2260319, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (ODF 4.14.6) matches configured target release for branch (ODF 4.14.6)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @keesturam

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 12, 2024

@openshift-ci[bot]: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: keesturam.

Note that only red-hat-storage members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@ELENAGER: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2260319, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (ODF 4.14.6) matches configured target release for branch (ODF 4.14.6)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @keesturam

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kseegerrh
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 12, 2024

@kseegerrh: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2260319, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (ODF 4.14.6) matches configured target release for branch (ODF 4.14.6)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @keesturam

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 12, 2024

@openshift-ci[bot]: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: keesturam.

Note that only red-hat-storage members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@kseegerrh: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2260319, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (ODF 4.14.6) matches configured target release for branch (ODF 4.14.6)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @keesturam

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 17, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: BenamarMk, ELENAGER, ShyamsundarR

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@BenamarMk BenamarMk merged commit bbd11b2 into red-hat-storage:release-4.14 Apr 17, 2024
21 of 25 checks passed
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 17, 2024

@ELENAGER: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2260319 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 2260319: Fencing takes more time than expected

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ELENAGER ELENAGER deleted the bug_2260319_long_fencing_4.14_backport branch June 6, 2024 13:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants