Skip to content

chore(deps): update linters (non-major)#4338

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/linters-(non-major)
Open

chore(deps): update linters (non-major)#4338
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/linters-(non-major)

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 2, 2026 •
edited
Loading

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
@eslint/js (source) 9.39.3 → 9.39.4 age confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) 8.56.1 → 8.57.1 age confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) 8.56.1 → 8.57.1 age confidence
eslint (source) 9.39.3 → 9.39.4 age confidence
eslint-plugin-playwright 2.7.1 → 2.10.1 age confidence
typescript-eslint (source) 8.56.1 → 8.57.1 age confidence

Release Notes

eslint/eslint (@​eslint/js)

v9.39.4

Compare Source

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v8.57.1

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [prefer-optional-chain] no report for property on intersection type (#​12126)
❤️ Thank You

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.57.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-condition] allow literal loop conditions in for/do loops (#​12080)
🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-base-to-string] fix false positive for toString with overloads (#​12089)
  • eslint-plugin: [prefer-promise-reject-errors] add allow TypeOrValueSpecifier to prefer-promise-reject-errors (#​12094)
  • typescript-estree: if the template literal is tagged and the text has an invalid escape, cooked will be null (#​11355)
  • eslint-plugin: guard against negative paramIndex in no-useless-default-assignment (#​12077)
  • eslint-plugin: handle statically analyzable computed keys in prefer-readonly (#​12079)
  • eslint-plugin: [strict-void-return] false positives with overloads (#​12055)
❤️ Thank You

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v8.57.1

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.57.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

eslint/eslint (eslint)

v9.39.4

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

Documentation

Chores

mskelton/eslint-plugin-playwright (eslint-plugin-playwright)

v2.10.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • missing-playwright-await: Don't flag Array.fill as missing await (cff9640), closes #​450
  • Narrow page detection to prefer false positives (10238e1)

v2.10.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • missing-playwright-await: Fix false positive with expect().resolves (352e15e), closes #​448
  • Support additional promise methods (8646e62), closes #​444
Features
  • missing-playwright-await: Add includePageLocatorMethods flag for checking more missing awaits (#​438) (41921f8), closes #​159
  • no-skipped-test: Support disallowFixme to optionally disable .fixme() annotations (6b42fdb), closes #​446

v2.9.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • no-restricted-roles: Catch all uses, not just on page methods (1861fa5)
  • Support nested locators everywhere (0e48186)
Features
  • no-duplicate-hooks: Mark as recommended (fe3ca54)
  • no-duplicate-slow: Mark as recommended (2f0b67d)
  • prefer-hooks-in-order: Mark as recommended (e8ae16e)
  • prefer-hooks-on-top: Mark as recommended (5ab9296)
  • prefer-locator: Mark as recommended (fcab221)
  • prefer-to-have-count: Mark as recommended (fcbf086)
  • prefer-to-have-length: Mark as recommended (c6c923e)

v2.8.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • Add missing test coverage and fix several minor bugs (#​434) (e3398ec)
  • missing-playwright-await: Handle spread elements (df30163), closes #​430
  • missing-playwright-await: Support more promise edge cases (b4cdcbd)
Features
  • Auto-detect test.extend() fixtures and import aliases (#​432) (8b22ee7)
typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (typescript-eslint)

v8.57.1

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.57.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team March 2, 2026 09:50
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 2, 2026

Hi @renovate[bot]. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a redhat-developer member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 2, 2026

Image was built and published successfully. It is available at:

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 89eaa91 to e40d40e Compare March 2, 2026 13:07
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 2, 2026

The container image build and publish workflows were skipped (either due to [skip-build] tag or no relevant changes with existing image).

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from e40d40e to ccd971b Compare March 4, 2026 13:10
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 4, 2026

Image was built and published successfully. It is available at:

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from ccd971b to 9bc3a42 Compare March 4, 2026 15:49
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 4, 2026

The container image build and publish workflows were skipped (either due to [skip-build] tag or no relevant changes with existing image).

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 9bc3a42 to 1cf1fee Compare March 5, 2026 06:00
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency eslint-plugin-playwright to v2.8.0 chore(deps): update dependency eslint-plugin-playwright to v2.9.0 Mar 5, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2026

Image was built and published successfully. It is available at:

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 1cf1fee to 4c7637f Compare March 5, 2026 06:53
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2026

The container image build and publish workflows were skipped (either due to [skip-build] tag or no relevant changes with existing image).

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch 2 times, most recently from e31a43a to e28fac8 Compare March 5, 2026 14:40
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2026

The container image build workflow finished with status: cancelled.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2026

Image was built and published successfully. It is available at:

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from e28fac8 to 0449cf7 Compare March 6, 2026 13:42
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2026

The container image build and publish workflows were skipped (either due to [skip-build] tag or no relevant changes with existing image).

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 0449cf7 to 9f5a4c1 Compare March 9, 2026 03:55
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 9, 2026

Image was built and published successfully. It is available at:

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 9f5a4c1 to cb93eb8 Compare March 9, 2026 17:06
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 9, 2026

The container image build and publish workflows were skipped (either due to [skip-build] tag or no relevant changes with existing image).

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from cb93eb8 to 308730f Compare March 9, 2026 19:05
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 9, 2026

Image was built and published successfully. It is available at:

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 3a39eaf to 2492ce3 Compare March 13, 2026 21:08
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 13, 2026

Image was built and published successfully. It is available at:

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 2492ce3 to 62203eb Compare March 16, 2026 04:07
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 16, 2026

The container image build and publish workflows were skipped (either due to [skip-build] tag or no relevant changes with existing image).

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 62203eb to dfdfdab Compare March 16, 2026 10:52
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 16, 2026

Image was built and published successfully. It is available at:

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from dfdfdab to 92e3d30 Compare March 16, 2026 17:09
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 16, 2026

The container image build and publish workflows were skipped (either due to [skip-build] tag or no relevant changes with existing image).

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 92e3d30 to 3fc64ae Compare March 17, 2026 17:04
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 17, 2026

Image was built and published successfully. It is available at:

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 3fc64ae to 621bbf9 Compare March 17, 2026 21:13
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 17, 2026

The container image build and publish workflows were skipped (either due to [skip-build] tag or no relevant changes with existing image).

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 621bbf9 to 6335787 Compare March 18, 2026 05:39
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 18, 2026

The container image build and publish workflows were skipped (either due to [skip-build] tag or no relevant changes with existing image).

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 6335787 to c828c87 Compare March 18, 2026 15:24
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 18, 2026

Image was built and published successfully. It is available at:

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from c828c87 to 7de46fa Compare March 18, 2026 19:05
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 18, 2026

The container image build and publish workflows were skipped (either due to [skip-build] tag or no relevant changes with existing image).

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 7de46fa to 6c61d72 Compare March 19, 2026 12:18
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 19, 2026

Image was built and published successfully. It is available at:

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 6c61d72 to 3fa130c Compare March 19, 2026 21:02
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 19, 2026

The container image build and publish workflows were skipped (either due to [skip-build] tag or no relevant changes with existing image).

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 3fa130c to 8df3e28 Compare March 20, 2026 12:50
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 20, 2026

Image was built and published successfully. It is available at:

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 8df3e28 to fb9f409 Compare March 20, 2026 22:51
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 20, 2026

The container image build and publish workflows were skipped (either due to [skip-build] tag or no relevant changes with existing image).

@renovate
chore(deps): update linters (non-major)
e2e386a 
Signed-off-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from fb9f409 to e2e386a Compare March 21, 2026 17:06
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 21, 2026

The container image build and publish workflows were skipped (either due to [skip-build] tag or no relevant changes with existing image).

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 21, 2026

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@gustavolira gustavolira Awaiting requested review from gustavolira

@HusneShabbir HusneShabbir Awaiting requested review from HusneShabbir

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

kind/dependency upgrade needs-ok-to-test

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants