Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: anyOf compare alternatives #1037

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

p-spacek
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

improve compare mechanism that should choose correct schema alternatives

What issues does this PR fix or reference?

fixes this issue #684
replces this PR #759

Is it tested? How?

added tests

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 12, 2025

Coverage Status

coverage: 84.246% (+0.06%) from 84.189%
when pulling e259f8f on jigx-com:fix/anyOf-compare-alternatives
into c1cab4d on redhat-developer:main.

@@ -866,7 +872,7 @@ function validate(
const val = getNodeValue(node);
let enumValueMatch = false;
for (const e of schema.enum) {
if (equals(val, e) || (callFromAutoComplete && isString(val) && isString(e) && val && e.startsWith(val))) {
if (equals(val, e) || isAutoCompleteEqualMaybe(callFromAutoComplete, node, val, e)) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

null value is a good match in auto-completion

} else if (compareResult === 0) {
} else if (
compareResult === 0 ||
((node.value === null || node.type === 'null') && node.length === 0) // node with no value can match any schema potentially
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

null yaml value is a good match for sub-schemas, similar to isAutoCompleteEqualMaybe for const and enums

if (
!maxOneMatch &&
!subValidationResult.hasProblems() &&
(!bestMatch.validationResult.hasProblems() || callFromAutoComplete)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(!bestMatch.validationResult.hasProblems() || callFromAutoComplete) didn't solve the previous problem properly
problem was when the order of the subschemas in anyOf changed.
this previous fix allows 'issues' only on the previous bestMatch

}
}
return bestMatch;
}

function mergeValidationMatches(
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

only refactor - move to separate function, no functional change

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants