docs: rewrite README to match wrapper documentation standard#13
docs: rewrite README to match wrapper documentation standard#13sayalibhavsar wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 3 minutes and 12 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe Changesnuma_streams README Expansion
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
This relates to RPOPC-937 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
21-21: ⚡ Quick winAdd language identifier to code fence.
The command-line options section begins with a fenced code block (line 21) that lacks a language specifier. Markdown best practices (and markdownlint) require specifying the language for syntax highlighting.
Proposed fix:
Replace:
22~
NUMA STREAMS Options:with:21~
NUMA STREAMS Options:This enables syntax highlighting and satisfies markdown linting standards.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@README.md` at line 21, The code fence at line 21 in README.md is missing a language identifier for syntax highlighting. Modify the opening fence from ``` to ```bash to specify the language and comply with markdown linting standards. This will enable proper syntax highlighting for the NUMA STREAMS Options section that follows.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 277-280: The README.md documentation for the --threads_multiple
parameter validation on line 280 incorrectly states it "silently defaults to 2
if set to 1" when the actual source code in numa_streams_run (lines 449-454)
explicitly exits with error code 1 if the value is less than 2. Update line 280
to change the description from "(silently defaults to 2 if set to 1)" to "(exits
with error if not)" to match the actual validation behavior and align with the
consistent pattern used for documenting --cache_multiply and
--cache_start_factor on the preceding lines.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 21: The code fence at line 21 in README.md is missing a language
identifier for syntax highlighting. Modify the opening fence from ``` to ```bash
to specify the language and comply with markdown linting standards. This will
enable proper syntax highlighting for the NUMA STREAMS Options section that
follows.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
sayalibhavsar
force-pushed
the
docs/rewrite-readme
branch
3 times, most recently
from
65c934e to
d49c72f
Compare
Comprehensive rewrite of the numa_streams-wrapper README modeled after the autohpl-wrapper documentation structure. All content is derived from the numa_streams-wrapper source code. Adds detailed sections for: command-line options (including all general_setup options), step-by-step workflow covering both numa_streams_run and run_numa_stream scripts, per-OS dependencies, STREAM operations and metrics, output files, usage examples, cache sizing and thread scaling logic, return codes, and notes covering architecture support, ARM Neoverse SLC handling, missing features (no schema validation or JSON output), and troubleshooting.
sayalibhavsar
force-pushed
the
docs/rewrite-readme
branch
from
d49c72f to
c48de90
Compare
1 participant
Summary
general_setupoptions (--debug,--no_pkg_install,--no_system_packages,--no_pip_packages,--run_label,--test_tools_release,--verify_skip,--json_skip)results_schema.py, no JSON output, noverify_resultscall, no OpenMetrics reset fileNew sections added
numa_streams_runandrun_numa_streamscriptsTest plan
numa_streams_runsource codegeneral_setupsource codenuma_streams.jsonfor all OS variantsrun_numa_streamSolves #12
Relates to JIRA: RPOPC-937