Skip to content

Conversation

@tonyskapunk
Copy link
Contributor

SUMMARY

Using the hints for the CI to trigger jobs in current labs.

ISSUE TYPE
  • Docs Fix
Tests

Test-Hint: no-check

Using the hints for the CI to trigger jobs in current labs.
@tonyskapunk tonyskapunk self-assigned this Dec 12, 2025
@tonyskapunk tonyskapunk requested review from a team as code owners December 12, 2025 17:27
@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Dec 12, 2025

from change #828:

  • no check (not a code change)

1 similar comment
@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Dec 12, 2025

from change #828:

  • no check (not a code change)

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The PR updates documentation and examples across three files to replace Dallas-based test references with Testvcp-based equivalents, including test names, lab identifiers, and inventory file paths.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Migration from Dallas to Testvcp test references
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, roles/chart_verifier/README.md
Updated test identifiers, lab paths, and example configurations replacing Dallas variants (TestDallas, TestDallasHybrid, TestDallasWorkload) with Testvcp equivalents (Testvcp, TestvcpHybrid, TestvcpWorkload); updated ansible_inventory path to generic clusterN-post.yml format

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

  • Documentation and template updates only
  • Homogeneous text substitutions across files (same Dallas → Testvcp pattern)
  • No logic or behavioral changes

Suggested reviewers

  • manurodriguez
  • betoredhat

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately summarizes the main change: updating documentation to reflect CI lab changes (Dallas → vcp).
Description check ✅ Passed The description is related to the changeset, explaining that the updates use hints for CI to trigger jobs in current labs.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs_labs

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7cfdaa4 and c8bfb2d.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (1 hunks)
  • CONTRIBUTING.md (2 hunks)
  • roles/chart_verifier/README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: 2025-05-22T18:25:16.134Z
Learnt from: tonyskapunk
Repo: redhatci/ansible-collection-redhatci-ocp PR: 651
File: roles/odf_setup/tasks/tests.yml:2-2
Timestamp: 2025-05-22T18:25:16.134Z
Learning: When working with the redhatci-ocp collection, task names that will appear in JUnit results should use underscores consistently without spaces (e.g., "Test_CephRBD_PVC" instead of "Test_ CephRBD PVC") to ensure compatibility with the dcijunit callback that generates JUnit reports.

Applied to files:

  • CONTRIBUTING.md
  • .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
🪛 LanguageTool
CONTRIBUTING.md

[grammar] ~101-~101: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...ou can use the following strings in the descrption of the PR: * Testvcp: baremetal cl...

(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
CONTRIBUTING.md

103-103: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 2

(MD007, ul-indent)


104-104: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 2

(MD007, ul-indent)


105-105: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 2

(MD007, ul-indent)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: dci/check
  • GitHub Check: Sanity Check (stable-2.18)
  • GitHub Check: Ansible-lint Check
  • GitHub Check: Sanity Check (stable-2.9)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (1)

19-21: LGTM! The examples are properly updated to reflect the current Testvcp lab references instead of the deprecated Dallas variants.

roles/chart_verifier/README.md (1)

164-164: LGTM! Generalizing the inventory path from a Dallas-specific example to a generic clusterN pattern makes the documentation clearer and more applicable across different environments.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link

Build failed.
https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/local/buildset/272e8237b9ca47ce906f3ddbfd597ae0

dci-rpm-build-el8 NODE_FAILURE Node request 200-0008113913 failed in 0s
dci-rpm-build-el9 NODE_FAILURE Node request 200-0008113914 failed in 0s

Copy link
Contributor

@ramperher ramperher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants