Switch to esbuild for building; add TypeScript for type checking. #204
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
✅ Deploy Preview for smilesdrawer-doc canceled.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This moves us to esbuild for bundling and minimizing, and adds TypeScript as a type checking pass. This speeds up the build a bit, and removes all the deprecated dependencies that GitHub keeps warning about.
This temporarily removes the documentation generator! I'd like to switch to TypeDoc once we have more consistent type annotations. This might be part of a bigger project where we pull all of the official documentation into the GitHub repo (so we can serve it via GitHub Pages without relying on external sites).