Skip to content

nNA addToObject argument#254

Closed
leopoldguyot wants to merge 6 commits intorformassspectrometry:masterfrom
leopoldguyot:nNA_argument
Closed

nNA addToObject argument#254
leopoldguyot wants to merge 6 commits intorformassspectrometry:masterfrom
leopoldguyot:nNA_argument

Conversation

@leopoldguyot
Copy link
Collaborator

#253 for context

@leopoldguyot leopoldguyot marked this pull request as draft January 19, 2026 18:06
@leopoldguyot leopoldguyot marked this pull request as ready for review January 20, 2026 09:06
@leopoldguyot leopoldguyot requested a review from lgatto January 20, 2026 09:07
@leopoldguyot leopoldguyot marked this pull request as draft January 22, 2026 16:05
@leopoldguyot leopoldguyot marked this pull request as ready for review January 26, 2026 10:57
@leopoldguyot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I just noticed that this implementation is not robust. Indeed it stores the pNA and nNA related to samples in the global colData. The problem is that pNA and nNA are set dependent. This can be an issue when someone wants to compute missingness metrics on sets that share colnames (ie. peptide and protein level set). I can't think of a way to store the set-wise pNA and nNA without using a set-wise colData?

@leopoldguyot leopoldguyot marked this pull request as draft March 5, 2026 08:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant