Skip to content

Conversation

@robfrank
Copy link
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the maven dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • pom.xml

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score Upgrade
high severity Uncontrolled Recursion
SNYK-JAVA-COMMONSLANG-10734077
  654   com.orientechnologies:orientdb-client:
3.2.23 -> 3.2.44
No Known Exploit

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JAVA-COMMONSLANG-10734077
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @robfrank, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, aims to enhance the project's security by updating a critical dependency. It resolves a high-severity vulnerability by bumping the version of orientdb-client, ensuring the application is protected against known exploits related to uncontrolled recursion.

Highlights

  • Dependency Upgrade: The com.orientechnologies:orientdb-client dependency has been upgraded from version 3.2.23 to 3.2.44.
  • Security Vulnerability Fix: This upgrade addresses a high-severity "Uncontrolled Recursion" vulnerability (SNYK-JAVA-COMMONSLANG-10734077) found in the orientdb-client library.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly upgrades com.orientechnologies:orientdb-client from 3.2.23 to 3.2.44 to resolve a security vulnerability. While the dependency update is correct, I have pointed out a potential issue this highlights in your test setup. The version of the OrientDB server used for testing is now significantly older than the client library. To prevent potential compatibility issues and ensure your tests remain reliable, I recommend updating the Docker image used in your tests to a version that matches the new client library version.

<postgresql.version>42.6.0</postgresql.version>
<selenium-remote-driver.version>4.14.1</selenium-remote-driver.version>
<orientdb-client.version>3.2.23</orientdb-client.version>
<orientdb-client.version>3.2.44</orientdb-client.version>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Upgrading orientdb-client to 3.2.44 is correct to fix the security vulnerability. However, this increases the version gap with the OrientDB server used in tests. The test environment uses a Docker image based on orientdb:3.2.20-tp3 (as defined in src/main/docker/orientdb/Dockerfile). This significant version mismatch between the client (3.2.44) and the server (3.2.20-tp3) could lead to subtle compatibility issues or flaky tests.

It is highly recommended to update the FROM instruction in the Dockerfile to use a version that matches the client, for example:

FROM orientdb:3.2.44

This will ensure the test environment is consistent with the application dependencies and improve the reliability of the tests.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants