Skip to content

Conversation

@robfrank
Copy link
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the maven dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • pom.xml

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score Upgrade
high severity Out-of-bounds Read
SNYK-JAVA-ORGLZ4-14151788
  726   com.orientechnologies:orientdb-client:
3.2.23 -> 3.2.47
No Known Exploit
high severity Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data
SNYK-JAVA-ORGLZ4-14219384
  696   com.orientechnologies:orientdb-client:
3.2.23 -> 3.2.47
No Known Exploit

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @robfrank, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request proactively enhances the project's security by automatically updating the orientdb-client dependency. The upgrade targets and resolves two critical vulnerabilities, an "Out-of-bounds Read" and an "Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data," ensuring a more secure and robust application without requiring manual intervention for dependency management.

Highlights

  • Security Vulnerability Fix: This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, addresses two high-severity security vulnerabilities found in the com.orientechnologies:orientdb-client dependency.
  • Dependency Upgrade: The orientdb-client dependency has been upgraded from version 3.2.23 to 3.2.47 to resolve the identified security issues.
  • Vulnerabilities Addressed: Specifically, the PR fixes an "Out-of-bounds Read" (score 726) and an "Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data" (score 696) vulnerability.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, upgrades the com.orientechnologies:orientdb-client dependency from version 3.2.23 to 3.2.47. This is an important security update that resolves two high-severity vulnerabilities. The change itself is correct and necessary. However, while the client library is being updated, the OrientDB server version used for testing remains on an older, pre-release version. To ensure test reliability and client-server compatibility, I recommend aligning the server version in your test containers with this new client version. My specific comment provides more detail on this.

<postgresql.version>42.6.0</postgresql.version>
<selenium-remote-driver.version>4.14.1</selenium-remote-driver.version>
<orientdb-client.version>3.2.23</orientdb-client.version>
<orientdb-client.version>3.2.47</orientdb-client.version>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Updating the orientdb-client version to 3.2.47 is correct for resolving the security vulnerabilities. However, the test environment appears to be using a much older and pre-release OrientDB server version (3.2.20-tp3, based on src/main/docker/orientdb/Dockerfile).

A significant version mismatch between the client and server can lead to subtle compatibility issues or tests that do not accurately reflect production behavior. To ensure the reliability of your tests, it is highly recommended to align the test server version with the client version. Please consider updating the base image in your Dockerfile to a more recent and stable version, ideally orientdb:3.2.47.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants